Deborah E. Schofield

2.5k total citations
46 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Deborah E. Schofield is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah E. Schofield has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Molecular Biology and 11 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Deborah E. Schofield's work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (6 papers). Deborah E. Schofield is often cited by papers focused on Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (6 papers). Deborah E. Schofield collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Deborah E. Schofield's co-authors include Eduardo J. Yunis, Timothy J. Triche, Jonathan A. Fletcher, Hiroyuki Shimada, Douglas C. Anthony, Poul H. Sorensen, J. Bruce Beckwith, Jeffrey Sklar, Arielle Lellouch‐Tubiana and Khê Hoang‐Xuan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Deborah E. Schofield

42 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah E. Schofield United States 21 822 581 462 231 213 46 1.6k
Göran Stenman Sweden 26 819 1.0× 529 0.9× 317 0.7× 145 0.6× 425 2.0× 52 2.2k
Charles D. Bangs United States 19 605 0.7× 264 0.5× 247 0.5× 228 1.0× 138 0.6× 44 1.6k
Piergiorgio Modena Italy 21 1.1k 1.3× 633 1.1× 309 0.7× 370 1.6× 225 1.1× 43 1.9k
Heather C. Flynn United States 13 537 0.7× 397 0.7× 244 0.5× 846 3.7× 113 0.5× 19 1.7k
Marjolijn C.J. Jongmans Netherlands 24 868 1.1× 426 0.7× 187 0.4× 349 1.5× 191 0.9× 69 1.8k
Carol Berger United States 22 831 1.0× 308 0.5× 304 0.7× 141 0.6× 65 0.3× 43 1.6k
Massimo Brisigotti Italy 20 488 0.6× 326 0.6× 107 0.2× 233 1.0× 377 1.8× 55 1.4k
Nobuyuki Shitara Japan 20 807 1.0× 228 0.4× 432 0.9× 394 1.7× 224 1.1× 64 1.9k
Gundula Thiel Germany 21 587 0.7× 218 0.4× 140 0.3× 423 1.8× 249 1.2× 51 1.5k
Jeff Stevens United States 10 723 0.9× 378 0.7× 209 0.5× 138 0.6× 1.3k 6.0× 19 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah E. Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah E. Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah E. Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah E. Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah E. Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah E. Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah E. Schofield. The network helps show where Deborah E. Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah E. Schofield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah E. Schofield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah E. Schofield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah E. Schofield. Deborah E. Schofield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davicioni, Elai, Michael J. Anderson, Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, et al.. (2009). Molecular Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma—Genotypic and Phenotypic Determinants of Diagnosis. American Journal Of Pathology. 174(2). 550–564. 204 indexed citations
2.
Speer, Allison L., Deborah E. Schofield, Kasper S. Wang, et al.. (2008). Contemporary management of lipoblastoma. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 43(7). 1295–1300. 46 indexed citations
3.
4.
Schofield, Deborah E., et al.. (2004). Selective Usage of D-Type Cyclins by Ewing’s Tumors and Rhabdomyosarcomas. Cancer Research. 64(17). 6026–6034. 52 indexed citations
5.
Schofield, Deborah E.. (2002). Extrarenal rhabdoid tumour. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 17 indexed citations
6.
Triche, Timothy J., et al.. (2001). DNA microarrays in pediatric cancer.. PubMed. 7(1). 2–15. 26 indexed citations
7.
Sévenet, Nicolas, Arielle Lellouch‐Tubiana, Deborah E. Schofield, et al.. (1999). Spectrum of hSNF5IINI1 Somatic Mutations in Human Cancer and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations. Human Molecular Genetics. 8(13). 2359–2368. 236 indexed citations
8.
Bloom, David A., Deborah E. Schofield, & Fredric A. Hoffer. (1997). Radiologic-Pathologic Conference of Children's Hospital Boston: A palpable pelvic mass in an adolescent girl. Pediatric Radiology. 27(11). 888–891. 1 indexed citations
9.
Schofield, Deborah E., J. Bruce Beckwith, & Jeffrey Sklar. (1996). Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome regions 22q11–12 and 11p15.5 in renal rhabdoid tumors. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 15(1). 10–17. 76 indexed citations
10.
Zec, Nataša, Umberto De Girolami, Deborah E. Schofield, R. Michael Scott, & Douglas C. Anthony. (1996). Giant Cell Ependymoma of the Filum Terminale. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 20(9). 1091–1101. 39 indexed citations
11.
White, Francis, Douglas C. Anthony, Edmond J. Yunis, et al.. (1995). Nonrandom chromosomal gains in pilocytic astrocytomas of childhood. Human Pathology. 26(9). 979–986. 56 indexed citations
12.
Schofield, Deborah E., et al.. (1995). Correlation of loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 9q with histological subtype in medulloblastomas.. PubMed. 146(2). 472–80. 67 indexed citations
13.
Donovan, Michael J., Eduardo J. Yunis, Umberto DeGirolami, Jonathan A. Fletcher, & Deborah E. Schofield. (1994). Chromosome aberrations in choroid plexus papillomas. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 11(4). 267–270. 20 indexed citations
14.
Schofield, Deborah E.. (1994). Determination of Chromosomal Aneuploidy Using Paraffin‐Embedded Tissue. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. 2(1). 1 indexed citations
16.
Keles, G. Evren, Mitchel S. Berger, Deborah E. Schofield, & Mark Bothwell. (1993). Nerve Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Medulloblastomas and the Potential Role of Nerve Growth Factor as a Differentiating Agent in Medulloblastoma Cell Lines. Neurosurgery. 32(2). 274???280–274???280. 2 indexed citations
17.
Schofield, Deborah E. & Jonathan A. Fletcher. (1992). Trisomy 12 in pediatric granulosa-stromal cell tumors. Demonstration by a modified method of fluorescence in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded material.. PubMed. 141(6). 1265–9. 60 indexed citations
18.
Geyer, J., Deborah E. Schofield, Mitchel S. Berger, & Jerrold M. Milstein. (1992). Differentiation of a primitive neuroectodermal tumor into a benign ganglioglioma. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 14(3). 237–41. 17 indexed citations
19.
Schofield, Deborah E., William A. Devine, & Eduardo J. Yunis. (1990). Acetylcholinesterase‐Stained Suction Rectal Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's Disease. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 11(2). 221–228. 5 indexed citations
20.
Schofield, Deborah E., William A. Devine, & Eduardo J. Yunis. (1990). Acetylcholinesterase-Stained Suction Rectal Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Hirschsprungʼs Disease. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 11(2). 221–228. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026