Nina Parry‐Langdon
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Physiology
- Epidemiology
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Suzanne AudreyJo HollidayLaurence MooreRona CampbellMichael BloorRachael A. HughesFenella StarkeyChris Roberts
- Topics
- School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers)Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Nina Parry‐Langdon
13 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- General Health Professions 315
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 148
- Physiology 135
- Epidemiology 121
- Speech and Hearing 117
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Parry‐Langdon
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Parry‐Langdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Parry‐Langdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Parry‐Langdon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Parry‐Langdon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Parry‐Langdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Parry‐Langdon. The network helps show where Nina Parry‐Langdon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Parry‐Langdon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Parry‐Langdon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Parry‐Langdon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Parry‐Langdon. Nina Parry‐Langdon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 353 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | A school-based, peer-led anti-smoking intervention that appears to work: a stop smoking in schools trial, England and Wales, 2001-2005 | 1 |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | Report on developing the European review protocol and completed feasibility test reports by the partners, Getting Evidence into Practice project | 1 |
| 7 | Socio-economic inequalities and health | 9 |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | How do teenagers and primary healthcare providers view each other? An overview of key themes. | 71 |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Nina Parry‐Langdon
Nina Parry‐Langdon is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (92 citations), Speech and Hearing (117 citations) and General Health Professions (315 citations). Nina Parry‐Langdon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne Audrey, Jo Holliday, Laurence Moore, Rona Campbell, Michael Bloor, Rachael A. Hughes, Fenella Starkey, Chris Roberts, L. Jacobson and Frank J. Elgar. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Addiction and European Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.