Fenella Starkey

1.0k citations
15 papers · 658 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Fenella Starkey

14 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Fenella Starkey
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Speech and Hearing 139
  • General Health Professions 311
  • Physiology 172
  • Safety Research 55
Replace Nina Parry‐Langdon with:
Nina Parry‐Langdon United Kingdom
Beth R. Hoffman United States
Sean Hanley United States
Elvira Elek United States
Tamar M. J. Antin United States
Rebecca Haines‐Saah Canada
Kerry E. Evers United States
Renita R. Glaser United States
Bonnie R. Brannon United States
Esther Backbier Netherlands
Fenella Starkey relative to Nina Parry‐Langdon United Kingdom Nina Parry‐Langdon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nina Parry‐Langdon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fenella Starkey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fenella Starkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fenella Starkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fenella Starkey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fenella Starkey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fenella Starkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fenella Starkey. The network helps show where Fenella Starkey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fenella Starkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fenella Starkey Line = papers co-authored together Fenella Starkey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008353
2 200985
3 200351
4 201143
5 200139
6 200536
7 199927
8 199916
9
Evaluation of HPSA/Bristol Old Vic Primary Drug Drama Project 1997/98
19983
10 19961
11 20231
12
Evaluation of Somerset peer education (drugs prevention) project 1996/7
19971
13
Evaluation of Somerset drug education initiative 1995-1998
19981
14
Evaluation of North Somerset pilot peer drug education project 1997-98
19981
15 20250

About Fenella Starkey

Fenella Starkey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Social Work Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (121 citations), Speech and Hearing (139 citations), General Health Professions (311 citations), Physiology (172 citations) and Safety Research (55 citations). Fenella Starkey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Moore, Rona Campbell, Suzanne Audrey, Jo Holliday, Michael Bloor, Rachael A. Hughes, Nina Parry‐Langdon, Judy Orme, John Hawkins and Rosalyn Denise Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Health Education, Health Education Research, Social Policy and Society, BMC Medical Ethics and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact