Nina Müller
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Ulrich WïttchenMichael HöflerRoselind LiebHildegard PfisterFrank JacobiMichael R. LiebowitzMurray SteinH. Sonntag
- Topics
- Health and Medical Studies (10 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nina Müller
30 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 904
- Social Psychology 516
- Psychiatry and Mental health 393
- General Health Professions 257
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Müller
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Müller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Müller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Müller. The network helps show where Nina Müller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Müller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Müller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Müller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Müller. Nina Müller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Prevalence, co-morbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: results from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS)breakdown → | 765 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 437 | |
| 17 | 215 | |
| 18 | 265 | |
| 19 | Affektive, somatoforme und Angststörungen in Deutschland. Erste Ergebnisse des bundesweiten Zusatzsurveys "Psychische Störungen". | 70 |
| 20 | Depressionen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung - schlecht erkannt und selten behandelt. | 15 |
About Nina Müller
Nina Müller is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (10 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (904 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (393 citations). Nina Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Michael Höfler, Roselind Lieb, Hildegard Pfister, Frank Jacobi, Michael R. Liebowitz, Murray Stein, H. Sonntag, Holger Sonntag and S. Storz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Medicine and European Journal of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.