Christoph Mitsch
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Neurology
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Co-authors
- Ursula Schmidt‐ErfurthBerthold PempChristoph ScholdaJan LammerMatthias BolzStefan SacuMichael KundiSonja Karst
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurologyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
- Partner nations
- AustriaIndiaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Christoph Mitsch
29 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Ophthalmology 269
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 198
- Neurology 47
- Molecular Biology 47
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 23
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Mitsch
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Mitsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Mitsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Mitsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Mitsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Mitsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Mitsch. The network helps show where Christoph Mitsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Mitsch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Mitsch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Mitsch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Mitsch. Christoph Mitsch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Thinning of the central neurosensory retina during anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic retinopathy. | 1 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Christoph Mitsch
Christoph Mitsch is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (269 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (198 citations) and Neurology (47 citations). Christoph Mitsch has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, India and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth, Berthold Pemp, Christoph Scholda, Jan Lammer, Matthias Bolz, Stefan Sacu, Michael Kundi, Sonja Karst, Gábor Deák and Philipp Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.