Nina Cimerman

1.6k citations
21 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 18

Nina Cimerman

21 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Nina Cimerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cancer Research 514
  • Nephrology 202
  • Immunology and Allergy 85
  • Rheumatology 143
  • Oncology 233
Replace Íñigo Santamaría with:
Íñigo Santamaría Spain
Rick L. Meek United States
David Farley United States
Yuanfu Xu China
Kouji Matsushima Japan
John G. Emery United States
Ramesh A. Bhat Canada
Fred Wong Canada
Timo Pikkarainen Sweden
Christophe Cataisson United States
Nina Cimerman relative to Íñigo Santamaría Spain Íñigo Santamaría's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Íñigo Santamaría · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Cimerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Cimerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Cimerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Cimerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Cimerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Cimerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Cimerman. The network helps show where Nina Cimerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Cimerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Cimerman Line = papers co-authored together Nina Cimerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201376
2 201318
3 200311
4 200336
5 200128
6 200144
7 200121
8 200178
9 200023
10
Cysteine proteinase inhibitors stefin A, stefin B, and cystatin C in sera from patients with colorectal cancer: relation to prognosis.
2000155
11 2000128
12 199941
13 199910
14 199919
15
Prognostic values of cathepsin B and carcinoembryonic antigen in sera of patients with colorectal cancer.
199858
16 1998128
17
Thermal denaturation of human cystatin C and two of its variants; comparison to chicken cystatin.
199710
18
Cathepsins B, H, and L and their inhibitors stefin A and cystatin C in sera of melanoma patients.
1997153
19 199619
20 199591

About Nina Cimerman

Nina Cimerman is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Rheumatology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (13 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (5 papers), Bone and Dental Protein Studies (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (3 papers), Phytase and its Applications (2 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (514 citations), Nephrology (202 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (85 citations). Nina Cimerman has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Janko Kos, Marta Krašovec, Pika Meško Brguljan, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Stanislav Šuškovič, Nils Brünner, Ib Jarle Christensen, Vito Türk, Borut Štabuc and Ana Schweiger. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, Biological Chemistry, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, British Journal of Cancer and FEBS Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026