Nima Ramezan‐Arab
About
In The Last Decade
Nima Ramezan‐Arab
4 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Physiology 89
- Molecular Biology 46
- Pharmacology 31
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 31
- Neurology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Nima Ramezan‐Arab
This map shows the geographic impact of Nima Ramezan‐Arab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nima Ramezan‐Arab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nima Ramezan‐Arab more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nima Ramezan‐Arab
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nima Ramezan‐Arab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nima Ramezan‐Arab. The network helps show where Nima Ramezan‐Arab may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nima Ramezan‐Arab
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nima Ramezan‐Arab. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nima Ramezan‐Arab based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nima Ramezan‐Arab. Nima Ramezan‐Arab is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 111 | |
| 4 | 15 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.