Nigel Bush
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 13
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 18
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 16
- Co-authors
- David D. LuxtonRussell A. McCannGreg M. RegerMatthew C. MishkindDerek J. SmolenskiNancy A. SkoppGary DonaldsonMel Haberman
- Journals
- Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (5 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (4 papers)Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (3 papers)Professional Psychology Research and Practice (3 papers)Psychological Services (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
Nigel Bush
91 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Applied Psychology 782
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- General Health Professions 1.1k
- Oncology 951
- Social Psychology 507
Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Bush
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Bush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Bush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Bush. The network helps show where Nigel Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Bush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 53 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 72 | |
| 20 | Assessing the quality of care. | 1975 | 14 |
About Nigel Bush
Nigel Bush is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Health and Oncology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (18 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (16 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (782 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Oncology (951 citations) and Social Psychology (507 citations). Nigel Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David D. Luxton, Russell A. McCann, Greg M. Reger, Matthew C. Mishkind, Derek J. Smolenski, Nancy A. Skopp, Gary Donaldson, Mel Haberman, Donna L. Berry and Keith M. Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Professional Psychology Research and Practice and Psychological Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.