Lie Wang
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Resilience and Mental Health
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 27
- Workplace Health and Well-being 25
- Employment and Welfare Studies 9
-
- Resilience and Mental Health 11
- Co-authors
- Li Liu (22 shared papers)Hui Wu (18 shared papers)Wei Sun (12 shared papers)Jiana Wang (11 shared papers)Meng Shi (10 shared papers)Yilong Yang (9 shared papers)Ying Chang (5 shared papers)Jialiang Fu (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (10 papers)PLoS ONE (9 papers)Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (7 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (5 papers)BMC Cancer (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lie Wang
100 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Applied Psychology 475
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- General Health Professions 1.9k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Leadership and Management 66
Countries citing papers authored by Lie Wang
This map shows the geographic impact of Lie Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lie Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lie Wang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lie Wang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lie Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lie Wang. The network helps show where Lie Wang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lie Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 159 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 152 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 147 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 140 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 136 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 129 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 127 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 123 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 117 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 112 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 110 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 101 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 98 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 94 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 93 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 90 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 86 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 86 |
About Lie Wang
Lie Wang is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Oncology and Applied Psychology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (27 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (25 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (17 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (15 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers) and Family Support in Illness (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (475 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), General Health Professions (1.9k citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations) and Leadership and Management (66 citations). Lie Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Li Liu, Hui Wu, Wei Sun, Jiana Wang, Meng Shi, Yilong Yang, Ying Chang, Jialiang Fu, Xiaoshi Yang and Xiaoxi Wang. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.