Deanna Buick
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- John WeinmanKeith J. PetrieLinda D. CameronRobert HorneRona Moss‐MorrisChris EllisJane ClatworthyMatthew Hankins
- Topics
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers)Family Support in Illness (3 papers)
- Journals
- Psychosomatic MedicineJournal of Psychosomatic ResearchJournal of Applied Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deanna Buick
10 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- General Health Professions 891
- Psychiatry and Mental health 779
- Clinical Psychology 648
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 448
- Social Psychology 438
Countries citing papers authored by Deanna Buick
This map shows the geographic impact of Deanna Buick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deanna Buick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deanna Buick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deanna Buick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deanna Buick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deanna Buick. The network helps show where Deanna Buick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deanna Buick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deanna Buick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deanna Buick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deanna Buick. Deanna Buick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 78 | |
| 2 | 456 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 148 | |
| 6 | Changing Illness Perceptions After Myocardial Infarction: An Early Intervention Randomized Controlled Trialbreakdown → | 633 |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)breakdown → | 2306 |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 119 |
About Deanna Buick
Deanna Buick is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Family Support in Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (249 citations), Applied Psychology (435 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (779 citations). Deanna Buick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Weinman, Keith J. Petrie, Linda D. Cameron, Robert Horne, Rona Moss‐Morris, Chris Ellis, Jane Clatworthy, Matthew Hankins, Roger J. Booth and Heather Leake Date. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.