Nicole van Nes

1.5k total citations
56 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Nicole van Nes is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology and Transportation. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicole van Nes has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 26 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Transportation. Recurrent topics in Nicole van Nes's work include Traffic and Road Safety (32 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (24 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (13 papers). Nicole van Nes is often cited by papers focused on Traffic and Road Safety (32 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (24 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (13 papers). Nicole van Nes collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Australia. Nicole van Nes's co-authors include Jacqueline Cramer, Paul van Gent, Bart van Arem, Haneen Farah, Michiel Christoph, Ingrid van Schagen, Stefan Brandenburg, Divera Twisk, W P Vlakveld and Jonathan De Bruin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Accident Analysis & Prevention and Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies.

In The Last Decade

Nicole van Nes

53 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicole van Nes Netherlands 15 311 299 164 159 154 56 1.0k
Byungjoo Choi South Korea 22 90 0.3× 469 1.6× 26 0.2× 49 0.3× 186 1.2× 58 1.9k
Grégoire S. Larue Australia 20 538 1.7× 528 1.8× 157 1.0× 45 0.3× 38 0.2× 102 1.2k
Diane Gyi United Kingdom 22 139 0.4× 888 3.0× 84 0.5× 8 0.1× 227 1.5× 82 2.3k
Najmedin Meshkati United States 15 145 0.5× 593 2.0× 47 0.3× 55 0.3× 102 0.7× 47 1.3k
Chiuhsiang Joe Lin Taiwan 26 60 0.2× 563 1.9× 56 0.3× 14 0.1× 183 1.2× 133 1.8k
Mansour Rahimi United States 18 66 0.2× 185 0.6× 127 0.8× 10 0.1× 56 0.4× 59 936
Stewart Birrell United Kingdom 29 620 2.0× 1.2k 4.0× 735 4.5× 31 0.2× 403 2.6× 95 2.7k
Ashleigh Filtness United Kingdom 22 666 2.1× 679 2.3× 189 1.2× 32 0.2× 35 0.2× 93 1.5k
Ralph Bruder Germany 12 188 0.6× 584 2.0× 225 1.4× 9 0.1× 398 2.6× 82 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole van Nes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole van Nes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole van Nes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole van Nes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole van Nes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole van Nes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole van Nes. The network helps show where Nicole van Nes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole van Nes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole van Nes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole van Nes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole van Nes. Nicole van Nes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nes, Nicole van, et al.. (2024). Workshop to Go Beyond Levels of Automation. 247–248. 1 indexed citations
2.
Tinga, Angelica M., et al.. (2022). Development and evaluation of a human machine interface to support mode awareness in different automated driving modes. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 92. 238–254. 5 indexed citations
4.
Varotto, Silvia F., Reinier J. Jansen, F D Bijleveld, & Nicole van Nes. (2020). Driver speed compliance following automatic incident detection: Insights from a naturalistic driving study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 150. 105939–105939. 11 indexed citations
5.
Gent, Paul van, Haneen Farah, Nicole van Nes, & Bart van Arem. (2019). HeartPy: A novel heart rate algorithm for the analysis of noisy signals. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 66. 368–378. 133 indexed citations
6.
Nes, Nicole van, Jonas Bärgman, Michiel Christoph, & Ingrid van Schagen. (2019). The potential of naturalistic driving for in-depth understanding of driver behavior: UDRIVE results and beyond. Safety Science. 119. 11–20. 36 indexed citations
7.
Gent, Paul van, Haneen Farah, Nicole van Nes, & Bart van Arem. (2018). Heart Rate Analysis for Human Factors: Development and Validation of an Open Source Toolkit for Noisy Naturalistic Heart Rate Data. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 56 indexed citations
8.
Vlakveld, W P, et al.. (2018). Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 58. 917–929. 64 indexed citations
9.
Gent, Paul van, Haneen Farah, Nicole van Nes, & Bart van Arem. (2018). Analysing Noisy Driver Physiology Real-Time Using Off-the-Shelf Sensors: Heart Rate Analysis Software from the Taking the Fast Lane Project.. Journal of Open Research Software. 2 indexed citations
10.
Logan, David, et al.. (2014). An exploration of alternative intersection designs in the context of Safe System. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 74. 314–323. 12 indexed citations
11.
Nes, Nicole van, et al.. (2013). The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: A pilot study on the right turn manoeuvre. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 58. 318–329. 6 indexed citations
12.
Nes, Nicole van & Ingrid van Schagen. (2010). Opportunities to Improve Speed Behavior: Credibility of Speed Limits and the Use of ISA. Advances in transportation studies. 20. 39–46. 3 indexed citations
13.
Nes, Nicole van, Stefan Brandenburg, & Divera Twisk. (2010). Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(3). 944–952. 41 indexed citations
14.
Marchau, Vincent, et al.. (2010). Enhancing speed management by in-car speed assistance systems. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 4(1). 3–11. 15 indexed citations
15.
Nes, Nicole van, et al.. (2010). Attitudes towards current and lowered speed limits in Australia. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(6). 2108–2116. 17 indexed citations
16.
Aarts, L T, et al.. (2009). Safe Speeds and Credible Speed Limits (SaCredSpeed): New Vision for Decision Making on Speed Management. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 9 indexed citations
17.
Morsink, Peter, et al.. (2008). In-Car Speed Assistance to Improve Speed Management. 8 indexed citations
18.
Nes, Nicole van, et al.. (2008). Improving speed behaviour: the potential of in-car speed assistance and speed limit credibility. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 2(4). 323–330. 27 indexed citations
19.
Nes, Nicole van & Jacqueline Cramer. (2008). Conceptual model on replacement behaviour. International Journal of Product Development. 6(3/4). 291–291. 6 indexed citations
20.
Nes, Nicole van, Jacqueline Cramer, & A. Stevels. (2002). Intensity of use, its relevance in environmental product assessment. A case study on televisions. 243–248.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026