Nicole Pearson

22 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Nicole Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Psychology 23
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Speech and Hearing 20
  • General Health Professions 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 39
Replace Millie Barrett with:
Millie Barrett United Kingdom
Oluremi A. Famodu United States
Myriam Casseus United States
Jennifer Warnick United States
Arwa Al-Shujairi United Arab Emirates
Brigitte Schweitzer France
Irene Heger Netherlands
Cristen Harris United States
Alba Vilaplana-Pérez Sweden
Raitany C. Almeida Brazil
Nicole Pearson relative to Millie Barrett United Kingdom Millie Barrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Millie Barrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Pearson. The network helps show where Nicole Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicole Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicole Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Nicole Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202137
2 202321
3 202115
4 202112
5 202311
6 202311
7 202210
8 20219
9 20209
10 20217
11 20206
12 20215
13 20244
14 20214
15 20233
16 20233
17 20232
18 20242
19 20212
20 20241

About Nicole Pearson

Nicole Pearson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (9 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (23 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations), Speech and Hearing (20 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (39 citations). Nicole Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Sze Lin Yoong, Luke Wolfenden, Alice Grady, Courtney Barnes, Melanie Lum, Jacklyn Jackson, Rachel Sutherland, Jannah Jones, Ann DeSmet and Melinda Hutchesson. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Obesity Reviews, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact