Millie Barrett

594 total citations
8 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

Millie Barrett is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Millie Barrett has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Millie Barrett's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers). Millie Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers). Millie Barrett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Millie Barrett's co-authors include Alan Richens, Janis Baird, Hazel Inskip, Kathryn Woods‐Townsend, Polly Hardy‐Johnson, Mark A. Hanson, Chandni Maria Jacob, Camille Parsons, Christina Vogel and Peter Stallybrass and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal Of Nutrition, Obesity Reviews and BMC Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Millie Barrett

7 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Millie Barrett United Kingdom 7 168 86 63 55 29 8 260
Anne Fuller Canada 9 136 0.8× 62 0.7× 110 1.7× 22 0.4× 65 2.2× 21 313
Acadia W. Buro United States 10 70 0.4× 49 0.6× 39 0.6× 99 1.8× 87 3.0× 52 258
Aleksandra Gomuła Poland 9 111 0.7× 94 1.1× 41 0.7× 13 0.2× 24 0.8× 29 241
Jack Winkler United Kingdom 6 118 0.7× 42 0.5× 47 0.7× 27 0.5× 60 2.1× 9 308
Shanna Wilson Canada 7 125 0.7× 77 0.9× 72 1.1× 31 0.6× 40 1.4× 12 293
Roger Figueroa United States 9 140 0.8× 71 0.8× 68 1.1× 34 0.6× 39 1.3× 35 325
Genette Ellis United Kingdom 11 56 0.3× 79 0.9× 16 0.3× 22 0.4× 53 1.8× 20 276
Sanja Musić Milanović Croatia 12 111 0.7× 32 0.4× 49 0.8× 12 0.2× 54 1.9× 41 318
Mariam Naguib Canada 4 162 1.0× 38 0.4× 73 1.2× 15 0.3× 35 1.2× 6 288
Jessica Tearne Australia 9 162 1.0× 75 0.9× 29 0.5× 20 0.4× 100 3.4× 11 350

Countries citing papers authored by Millie Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Millie Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Millie Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Millie Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Millie Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Millie Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Millie Barrett. The network helps show where Millie Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Millie Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Millie Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Millie Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Millie Barrett. Millie Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Mason, M. M., Sarah Shaw, Janis Baird, et al.. (2025). Development of two short FFQ to assess diet quality in UK pre-school and primary school-aged children based on National Diet and Nutrition Survey data. British Journal Of Nutrition. 133(9). 1287–1296.
2.
Barrett, Millie, et al.. (2024). The Healthy Start scheme in England “is a lifeline for families but many are missing out”: a rapid qualitative analysis. BMC Medicine. 22(1). 177–177. 8 indexed citations
3.
Shaw, Sarah, Millie Barrett, Cyrus Cooper, et al.. (2023). Influences of the community and consumer nutrition environment on the food purchases and dietary behaviors of adolescents: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 24(7). e13569–e13569. 14 indexed citations
4.
Jacob, Chandni Maria, Polly Hardy‐Johnson, Hazel Inskip, et al.. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions with health education to reduce body mass index in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 18(1). 1–1. 119 indexed citations
5.
Strömmer, Sofia, Wendy Lawrence, Sarah Shaw, et al.. (2020). Behaviour change interventions: getting in touch with individual differences, values and emotions. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 11(6). 589–598. 11 indexed citations
6.
Barrett, Millie, Sarah Crozier, Daniel Lewis, et al.. (2017). Greater access to healthy food outlets in the home and school environment is associated with better dietary quality in young children. Public Health Nutrition. 20(18). 3316–3325. 20 indexed citations
7.
Barrett, Millie & Peter Stallybrass. (2013). Printing, Writing and a Family Archive: Recording the First World War. History Workshop Journal. 75(1). 1–32. 7 indexed citations
8.
Barrett, Millie & Alan Richens. (2003). Epilepsy and pregnancy: Report of an Epilepsy Research Foundation Workshop. Epilepsy Research. 52(3). 147–187. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026