Nicola Ellis
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Carl MayFrances S MairLinda GaskAneez EsmailTheresa AtkinsonMarco CorazzariLaura FalascaPenny E. Lovat
- Topics
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers)Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Health Information ManagementApplied PsychologyOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nicola Ellis
18 papers receiving 471 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
- General Health Professions 162
- Epidemiology 130
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 87
- Sociology and Political Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Ellis
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Ellis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Ellis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Ellis. The network helps show where Nicola Ellis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicola Ellis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicola Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicola Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicola Ellis. Nicola Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 194 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | Chemical pathology and the family doctor. | 1 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nicola Ellis
Nicola Ellis is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Applied Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (56 citations), Applied Psychology (59 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (87 citations). Nicola Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carl May, Frances S Mair, Linda Gask, Aneez Esmail, Theresa Atkinson, Marco Corazzari, Laura Falasca, Penny E. Lovat, Gian María Fimia and Mauro Piacentini. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Social Science & Medicine and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.