William Stengle

794 citations
12 papers · 657 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesMalaysia

In The Last Decade

William Stengle

12 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

William Stengle
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Health Professions 348
  • Oncology 228
  • Applied Psychology 114
  • Sociology and Political Science 110
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 94
Replace Helene McDowell with:
Helene McDowell United States
Debra J Holden United States
Henk Boer Netherlands
Tabetha A. Brockman United States
Gina Landucci United States
Whitney M. Randolph United States
Ann O. Amuta United States
Linda Mayne United States
Vipat Kuruchittham United States
Rebecca Moultrie United States
William Stengle relative to Helene McDowell United States Helene McDowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Helene McDowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Stengle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Stengle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stengle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stengle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Stengle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stengle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stengle. The network helps show where William Stengle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Stengle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Stengle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Stengle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Stengle. William Stengle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 130
2 164
3 55
4 58
5 19
6 14
7 48
8 4
9 85
10
Outreach programs and their effects within the Cancer Information Service network.
8
11 32
12
Detroit's avoidable mortality project: breast cancer control for inner-city women.
40

About William Stengle

William Stengle is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Oncology and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (114 citations), General Health Professions (348 citations) and Health (86 citations). William Stengle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include David H. Gustafson, Robert P. Hawkins, Fiona McTavish, Kanittha Volrathongchai, Wei Chih Chen, L H Warbasse, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Anita Moncrease, Robert C. Burack and Denise Ballard. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Preventive Medicine and Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026