Nick Moore

767 citations
61 papers · 400 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Moore

53 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Nick Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Library and Information Sciences 106
  • Communication 37
  • General Social Sciences 12
  • Information Systems 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
Replace Sudatta Chowdhury with:
Sudatta Chowdhury United Kingdom
Michael Khoo United States
Anne J. Gilliland‐Swetland United States
Miguel Ángel Marzal García-Quismondo Spain
James G. Neal United States
Diane Harley United States
Núria Ferrán-Ferrer Spain
Krystyna K. Matusiak United States
Laura J. Neumann United States
Kulthida Tuamsuk Thailand
Nick Moore relative to Sudatta Chowdhury United Kingdom Sudatta Chowdhury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sudatta Chowdhury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Moore. The network helps show where Nick Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Moore Line = papers co-authored together Nick Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
How to do research
198331
2
Optimistic Duplicate Address Detection
200430
3 200223
4 201920
5 201418
6 201517
7 198715
8
The emerging markets for librarians and information workers
198615
9 201312
10 200011
11 199810
12 199310
13 198510
14 200210
15
Information-intensive management : impact on the employment market for information professionals
198810
16 19899
17 19859
18 20229
19 19877
20
Confucius or capitalism?: policies for an information society
19987

About Nick Moore

Nick Moore is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 61 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (6 papers), E-Government and Public Services (5 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (4 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (3 papers), Education Systems and Policy (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers) and Irish and British Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (106 citations), Communication (37 citations), General Social Sciences (12 citations), Information Systems (75 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (7 citations). Nick Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Elaine Kempson, Rita Marcella, Graeme Baxter, Greg J. Coman, Jean‐Pierre Valentin, Nigel Preston, Helen Prior, Melony J. Sellars, Ana Norman‐López and Sean Pascoe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Science, IFLA Journal, Policy Studies, Journal of Documentation and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact