Nick Carter

34 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

Nick Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Occupational Therapy 36
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 83
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
  • Ecology 125
  • Ecological Modeling 19
Replace Erwin R. Schmidt with:
Erwin R. Schmidt Germany
Kaoru Saito Japan
Piero Cervella Italy
Norman Maclean United Kingdom
Maria A. Serrat United States
Tracy Lee Canada
Aya Takahashi Japan
Heather Campbell United States
Shuhua Li China
James J. Robinson United Kingdom
Nick Carter relative to Erwin R. Schmidt Germany Erwin R. Schmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Erwin R. Schmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Carter. The network helps show where Nick Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Carter Line = papers co-authored together Nick Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992143
2 2002141
3 200055
4 201651
5 200346
6 199435
7 199433
8 199720
9
See How We Grow: A Report on the Status of Parenting Education in the U.S.
199619
10 199618
11 201715
12 201013
13 20129
14 19949
15 20199
16 20138
17 20198
18
Modern Italy in Historical Perspective
20107
19 20156
20
Rethinking the Italian Liberal State
20114

About Nick Carter

Nick Carter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme function and inhibition (8 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (8 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (36 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations), Ecology (125 citations) and Ecological Modeling (19 citations). Nick Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Juliet A. Vickery, Robert J. Fuller, Gareth J. Thomas, Richard E. Tashian, Nils Bergenhem, David Hewett‐Emmett, Dorothea Bedigian, Simon Martin, Lauren E. Kahn and Isabelle Mahieu. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Modern Italy, Journal of Contemporary History, The Historical Journal and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact