Nick Carter

5.7k total citations
41 papers, 680 citations indexed

About

Nick Carter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Nick Carter has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 680 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Nick Carter's work include Enzyme function and inhibition (8 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (8 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers). Nick Carter is often cited by papers focused on Enzyme function and inhibition (8 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (8 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers). Nick Carter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Nick Carter's co-authors include Robert J. Fuller, Juliet A. Vickery, Gareth J. Thomas, Nils Bergenhem, Richard E. Tashian, David Hewett‐Emmett, Simon Martin, Dorothea Bedigian, Lauren E. Kahn and Isabelle Mahieu and has published in prestigious journals such as FEBS Letters, The American Journal of Cardiology and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

In The Last Decade

Nick Carter

34 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nick Carter United Kingdom 12 251 125 83 74 74 41 680
Peter Schumacher Switzerland 23 420 1.7× 57 0.5× 55 0.7× 25 0.3× 122 1.6× 58 1.6k
Kaoru Saito Japan 16 117 0.5× 49 0.4× 71 0.9× 4 0.1× 16 0.2× 95 747
Jessica Alexander United States 16 231 0.9× 109 0.9× 18 0.2× 14 0.2× 32 0.4× 32 692
James J. Robinson United Kingdom 12 148 0.6× 38 0.3× 18 0.2× 24 0.3× 82 1.1× 36 533
Caroline Cartwright United Kingdom 20 57 0.2× 44 0.4× 30 0.4× 17 0.2× 72 1.0× 71 1.5k
Tina Lee United States 13 139 0.6× 105 0.8× 159 1.9× 10 0.1× 13 0.2× 19 641
Aya Takahashi Japan 23 386 1.5× 141 1.1× 22 0.3× 15 0.2× 4 0.1× 93 1.6k
Ashley Young United States 11 247 1.0× 31 0.2× 18 0.2× 19 0.3× 113 1.5× 17 695
Nanette M. Nascone‐Yoder United States 16 397 1.6× 35 0.3× 29 0.3× 10 0.1× 27 0.4× 27 709
Jennifer Koenig United Kingdom 19 693 2.8× 202 1.6× 59 0.7× 48 0.6× 10 0.1× 36 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Carter. The network helps show where Nick Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nick Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nick Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nick Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nick Carter. Nick Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Carter, Nick. (2020). “What Shall We Do With It Now?”: The Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana and the Difficult Heritage of Fascism. Australian Journal of Politics & History. 66(3). 377–395.
3.
Carter, Nick. (2017). A word about: Revisiting a theology of institutions. Review & Expositor. 114(1). 15–17. 1 indexed citations
4.
Carter, Nick & Simon Martin. (2017). The management and memory of fascist monumental art in postwar and contemporary Italy: the case of Luigi Montanarini’sApotheosis of Fascism. Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 22(3). 338–364. 15 indexed citations
5.
Panagiotopoulou, Ioanna, Nick Carter, Mark Lewis, & Sudhindra T. V. Rao. (2012). Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital: is it safe and feasible?. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 10(2). 112–116. 9 indexed citations
6.
Carter, Nick. (2011). Rethinking the Italian Liberal State. Contemporary Italian Politics. 3(2). 225. 4 indexed citations
7.
Carter, Nick, et al.. (2011). Partnering with Local Forces. The RUSI Journal. 156(3). 34–40. 1 indexed citations
8.
Carter, Nick. (2010). Modern Italy in Historical Perspective. Research Bank (Australian Catholic University). 7 indexed citations
10.
Carter, Nick, et al.. (2003). A Multicenter, Single-Masked Study of Medial, Neutral, and Lateral Patellar Taping in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 33(8). 437–448. 46 indexed citations
11.
Llorente, Francisco Rubio, et al.. (2002). Preliminary results of the molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis in Cuban families. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 17(5). 344–347. 2 indexed citations
12.
Tashian, Richard E., David Hewett‐Emmett, Nick Carter, & Nils Bergenhem. (2000). Carbonic anhydrase (CA)-related proteins (CA-RPs), and transmembrane proteins with CA or CA-RP domains. Birkhäuser Basel eBooks. 105–120. 55 indexed citations
13.
Nógrádi, Antal, et al.. (1997). Carbonic anhydrase II and carbonic anhydrase-related protein in the cerebellar cortex of normal and lurcher mice. Developmental Brain Research. 98(1). 91–101. 20 indexed citations
14.
Zhang, Yufeng, et al.. (1996). Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism in angina pectoris with normal coronary arteriograms. The American Journal of Cardiology. 77(10). 877–879. 3 indexed citations
15.
Carter, Nick & Lauren E. Kahn. (1996). See How We Grow: A Report on the Status of Parenting Education in the U.S.. 19 indexed citations
16.
Mahieu, Isabelle, Anand K Saggar‐Malik, E Hollande, & Nick Carter. (1995). Localisation and characterisation of carbonic anhydrase isozymes (CA I. CA II. CA III and CA IV) in an umbilical vein endothelial cell line (EA-hy926). Biochemical Society Transactions. 23(2). 308S–308S. 3 indexed citations
17.
Mahieu, Isabelle, Frédéric Becq, Thomas J. Wolfensberger, et al.. (1994). The expression of carbonic anhydrases II and IV in the human pancreatic cancer cell line (Capan 1) is associated with bicarbonate ion channels. Biology of the Cell. 81(2). 131–141. 33 indexed citations
18.
Mahieu, Isabelle, E Hollande, & Nick Carter. (1994). Membrane targetting of carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) in human pancreatic ductal Capan 1 cells in culture. Biochemical Society Transactions. 22(4). 438S–438S. 1 indexed citations
19.
Nógrádi, Antal, et al.. (1994). Lurching, reeling, waddling and staggering in mice - is carbonic anhydrase (CA) VIII a candidate gene?. Biochemical Society Transactions. 22(3). 359S–359S. 9 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Alberto, et al.. (1989). Localized expression of carbonic anhydrase genes in liver and muscle detected by hybridization in situ. Biochemical Society Transactions. 17(3). 526–526. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026