Amy Hurst

4.3k citations
114 papers · 2.9k indexed · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Hurst

111 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Amy Hurst
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.5k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 393
  • Occupational Therapy 570
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Computer Science Applications 202
Replace Cynthia L. Bennett with:
Cynthia L. Bennett United States
Shaun K. Kane United States
Helen Petrie United Kingdom
Chieko Asakawa Japan
Khai N. Truong Canada
Simeon Keates United Kingdom
Massimo Zancanaro Italy
Gregg C. Vanderheiden United States
Shiri Azenkot United States
Hironobu Takagi Japan
Amy Hurst relative to Cynthia L. Bennett United States Cynthia L. Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Cynthia L. Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Hurst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Hurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Hurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Hurst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Hurst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Hurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Hurst. The network helps show where Amy Hurst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Hurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Hurst Line = papers co-authored together Amy Hurst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011199
2 2015145
3 2002132
4 2005128
5 2014105
6 2013102
7 2014102
8 200488
9 201687
10 201381
11 201277
12 201473
13 201272
14 201461
15
Electronic Guidebooks and Visitor Attention.
200157
16 201653
17 201651
18 200747
19 200747
20 201546

About Amy Hurst

Amy Hurst is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Human-Computer Interaction, Occupational Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Science Applications, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (51 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (35 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (28 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (28 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (24 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (14 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (1.5k citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (393 citations), Occupational Therapy (570 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Computer Science Applications (202 citations). Amy Hurst has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Shaun K. Kane, Erin Buehler, Michele Williams, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott E. Hudson, Jodi Forlizzi, Patrick Carrington, Margaret H. Szymanski, Allison Woodruff and Paul M. Aoki. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, interactions, The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, Fashion Practice and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026