Mark Lewis

1.2k total citations
17 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Mark Lewis is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Lewis has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Oncology and 6 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark Lewis's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). Mark Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). Mark Lewis collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Mark Lewis's co-authors include Campbell Thompson, John Slavotinek, Lilian Kow, Jim Toouli, James W. Moore, A A M Lewis, L Meleagros, Tarik Sammour, G A Khoury and Michelle L. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Obesity Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mark Lewis

17 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Lewis Australia	12	301	150	147	92	85	17	457
Stephen D. Wohlgemuth United States	12	381 1.3×	57 0.4×	186 1.3×	64 0.7×	50 0.6×	19	590
Alicia Calleja‐Fernández Spain	13	132 0.4×	243 1.6×	67 0.5×	31 0.3×	43 0.5×	33	440
Shai Meron Eldar Israel	13	481 1.6×	162 1.1×	22 0.1×	74 0.8×	75 0.9×	50	563
Soraya Rodrigues de Almeida Sanches Brazil	9	265 0.9×	112 0.7×	25 0.2×	28 0.3×	90 1.1×	14	323
Sorena Afshar United Kingdom	11	263 0.9×	84 0.6×	72 0.5×	37 0.4×	25 0.3×	17	419
Mohammad Kermansaravi Iran	16	604 2.0×	195 1.3×	49 0.3×	32 0.3×	26 0.3×	92	679
Jeremy Tan Singapore	10	341 1.1×	90 0.6×	26 0.2×	21 0.2×	53 0.6×	44	421
H. Gislason Norway	12	590 2.0×	57 0.4×	118 0.8×	81 0.9×	35 0.4×	22	661
John Paul Gonzalvo United States	11	576 1.9×	146 1.0×	20 0.1×	54 0.6×	227 2.7×	21	742
In Du Jeong South Korea	12	186 0.6×	76 0.5×	19 0.1×	52 0.6×	292 3.4×	29	618

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lewis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lewis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lewis. The network helps show where Mark Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Lewis. Mark Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Traeger, Luke, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Tracy Fitzsimmons, et al.. (2024). Pyridostigmine to Reduce the duration of postoperative Ileus after Colorectal surgery (PyRICo-RCT): randomized clinical trial. British journal of surgery. 111(5). 2 indexed citations

Vather, Ryash, et al.. (2024). Patient satisfaction with nurse‐led coordination of colorectal cancer treatment: a short survey. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 94(10). 1678–1680. 1 indexed citations

Traeger, Luke, et al.. (2023). The impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative ileus following colorectal cancer surgery. Techniques in Coloproctology. 27(12). 1265–1274. 14 indexed citations

Traeger, Luke, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Martin K. Oehler, et al.. (2022). Short‐term outcomes following development of a dedicated pelvic exenteration service in a tertiary centre. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 92(10). 2620–2627. 5 indexed citations

Dudi‐Venkata, Nagendra N., Hidde M. Kroon, Sergei Bedrikovetski, et al.. (2021). Impact of STIMUlant and osmotic LAXatives (STIMULAX trial) on gastrointestinal recovery after colorectal surgery: randomized clinical trial. British journal of surgery. 108(7). 797–803. 16 indexed citations

Dudi‐Venkata, Nagendra N., Hidde M. Kroon, Sergei Bedrikovetski, et al.. (2021). PyRICo‐Pilot: pyridostigmine to reduce the duration of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery – a phase II study. Colorectal Disease. 23(8). 2154–2160. 12 indexed citations

Bedrikovetski, Sergei, Nagendra N. Dudi‐Venkata, Hidde M. Kroon, et al.. (2019). Systematic review of rectal stump management during and after emergency total colectomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 89(12). 1556–1560. 10 indexed citations

Duffield, Jaime A., et al.. (2018). Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Instillation and Postoperative Infusion Improves Functional Recovery Following Colectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 61(10). 1205–1216. 16 indexed citations

Sammour, Tarik, et al.. (2017). Validation of an online risk calculator for the prediction of anastomotic leak after colon cancer surgery and preliminary exploration of artificial intelligence-based analytics. Techniques in Coloproctology. 21(11). 869–877. 28 indexed citations

10.

Sammour, Tarik, et al.. (2016). A simple web-based risk calculator (www.anastomoticleak.com) is superior to the surgeon’s estimate of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection. Techniques in Coloproctology. 21(1). 35–41. 22 indexed citations

11.

Panagiotopoulou, Ioanna, Nick Carter, Mark Lewis, & Sudhindra T. V. Rao. (2012). Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital: is it safe and feasible?. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 10(2). 112–116. 9 indexed citations

12.

Lewis, Mark, et al.. (2007). Rapid significant weight loss and regional lipid deposition: Implications for insulin sensitivity. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. 1(1). 7–16. 11 indexed citations

13.

Lewis, Mark, et al.. (2006). Change in Liver Size and Fat Content after Treatment with Optifast<SUP>®</SUP> Very Low Calorie Diet. Obesity Surgery. 16(6). 697–701. 176 indexed citations

14.

Lewis, Mark, Lilian Kow, John Slavotinek, et al.. (2005). The Early Effects of Weight Loss Surgery on Regional Adiposity. Obesity Surgery. 15(10). 1449–1455. 24 indexed citations

15.

Hong, Dennis, Mark Lewis, Jeanine Tabet, & Mehran Anvari. (2002). Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Resection for Benign Colorectal Disease. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 12(4). 238–242. 29 indexed citations

16.

Low, J. C., Phil Scott, Fiona Howie, et al.. (1996). Sulphur‐induced polioencephalomalacia in lambs. Veterinary Record. 138(14). 327–329. 27 indexed citations

17.

Khoury, G A, Mark Lewis, L Meleagros, & A A M Lewis. (1987). Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial.. PubMed. 69(1). 5–7. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact