Nicholas Stanger

797 citations
23 papers · 594 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Stanger

23 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Nicholas Stanger
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 174
  • Social Psychology 349
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 126
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 32
  • Safety Research 53
Replace Maret Pihu with:
Maret Pihu Estonia
Manuel Alcaraz‐Ibáñez Spain
João Moutão Portugal
Lisa Musculus Germany
Dylan Poulus Australia
Julie Boiché France
Victoria E. Warburton United Kingdom
Devan Antczak Australia
Geoffrey Schweizer Germany
Roberto Ferriz Spain
Nicholas Stanger relative to Maret Pihu Estonia Maret Pihu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Maret Pihu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Stanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Stanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Stanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Stanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Stanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Stanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Stanger. The network helps show where Nicholas Stanger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Stanger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Stanger Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Stanger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201384
2 201767
3 201261
4 201552
5 201849
6 201240
7 201636
8 201629
9 201224
10 202023
11 202020
12 202117
13 201714
14 202213
15 201811
16 202111
17 201910
18 20198
19 20208
20 20206

About Nicholas Stanger

Nicholas Stanger is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Physiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Doping in Sports (5 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Thermoregulation and physiological responses (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (174 citations), Social Psychology (349 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (126 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (32 citations) and Safety Research (53 citations). Nicholas Stanger has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Maria Kavussanu, Christopher Ring, Susan H. Backhouse, Ian D. Boardley, Emily L. Williams, Jim McKenna, David McIntyre, Adrian R. Willoughby, Jamie Poolton and Laurie Patterson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of sport and exercise, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact