Nicholas Khoo

446 citations
30 papers · 183 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Khoo

26 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Nicholas Khoo
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Development 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 143
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 93
  • General Energy 2
Replace Wu Xinbo with:
Wu Xinbo China
Ron Huisken Australia
Van Jackson New Zealand
Wang Jisi China
Kevin Narizny United States
Mike Mochizuki United States
Joel Wuthnow United States
Jonathan Paquin Canada
Jonathan Fulton United Arab Emirates
Reinhard Drifte United Kingdom
Nicholas Khoo relative to Wu Xinbo China Wu Xinbo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wu Xinbo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Khoo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Khoo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Khoo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Khoo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Khoo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Khoo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Khoo. The network helps show where Nicholas Khoo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Khoo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Khoo Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Khoo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200445
2 201122
3
China Engages Asia
200519
4 200412
5 201510
6 200510
7 20148
8 20026
9 20136
10 20165
11 20135
12 20115
13 20204
14 20103
15 20113
16 20132
17
Donald Trump and the new Jacksonians
20172
18 20212
19 20222
20
What the WikiLeaks Documents Tell us About Asian Security
20112

About Nicholas Khoo

Nicholas Khoo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, Demography and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 30 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (15 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (3 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (3 papers) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (67 citations), Political Science and International Relations (143 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (93 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Nicholas Khoo has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Smith, David Martin Jones, David Shambaugh, M.L.R. Smith, Andrew T. H. Tan, Chien-peng Chung and Alexander C. Tan. Their work appears in journals such as International Security, Asian Security, Orbis, Political Science Quarterly and European Journal of East Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact