Mike Mochizuki
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Development top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Michael O’HanlonLucian W. PyeJeffrey W. HornungDonald S. ZagoriaNeil RenwickEllis S. KraussThomas U. BergerJennifer Lind
- Topics
- Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (6 papers)Japanese History and Culture (5 papers)International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mike Mochizuki
23 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Political Science and International Relations 164
- Sociology and Political Science 133
- Development 49
- Cultural Studies 35
- Economics and Econometrics 21
Countries citing papers authored by Mike Mochizuki
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Mochizuki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Mochizuki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Mochizuki more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Mochizuki
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Mochizuki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Mochizuki. The network helps show where Mike Mochizuki may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Mochizuki
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Mochizuki. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Mochizuki based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Mochizuki. Mike Mochizuki is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The Japan - U.S. alliance and China - Taiwan relations : implications for Okinawa | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | The Okinawa question and the U.S.-Japan alliance | 4 |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | The U.S.-Japan security alliance in the 21st century : prospects for incremental change | 1 |
| 11 | Security and Economic Interdependence in Northeast Asia | 12 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Toward a true alliance : restructuring U.S.-Japan security relations | 17 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | Managing and influencing the Japanese legislative process : the role of parties and the National Diet | 11 |
About Mike Mochizuki
Mike Mochizuki is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Development and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (6 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (49 citations), Political Science and International Relations (164 citations) and Cultural Studies (35 citations). Mike Mochizuki has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael O’Hanlon, Lucian W. Pye, Jeffrey W. Hornung, Donald S. Zagoria, Neil Renwick, Ellis S. Krauss, Thomas U. Berger, Jennifer Lind, Michael J. Green and Michael Swaine. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, International Security and The Washington Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.