Jonathan Fulton
Impact in
- Development top 5%
- International Development and Aid
Papers in
-
- Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts 19
- Socioeconomic Development in MENA 11
- China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations 2
- Political Conflict and Governance 2
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy 8
Jonathan Fulton
22 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Development 56
- General Energy 7
- Political Science and International Relations 109
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Fulton
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Fulton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Fulton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Fulton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Fulton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Fulton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Fulton. The network helps show where Jonathan Fulton may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 12 | The Gulf between the Indo-Pacific and the Belt and Road Initiative | 2018 | 7 |
| 13 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | Friends with Benefits: China’s Partnership Diplomacy in the Gulf | 2019 | 2 |
| 19 | China's Presence in the Middle East: The Implications of the One Belt, One Road Initiative ed. by Anoushiravan Ehteshami, Niv Horesh, and: The Red Star and the Crescent: China and the Middle East ed. by James Reardon-Anderson (review) | 2018 | 1 |
| 20 | Why Saudi Arabia is turning to Asia | 2019 | 1 |
About Jonathan Fulton
Jonathan Fulton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Development, Anthropology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 25 papers that have together received 178 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (19 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (11 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers), International Development and Aid (5 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (3 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (2 papers), Belt and Road Initiative (2 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (56 citations), General Energy (7 citations), Political Science and International Relations (109 citations), Sociology and Political Science (116 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (22 citations). Jonathan Fulton has collaborated with scholars based in United Arab Emirates, United States and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, The Middle East Journal, Middle East Policy, Journal of Contemporary China and Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.