Cinnamon S. Bloss
- Genetics top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicholas J. SchorkEric J. TopolEric CourchesneBurcu F. DarstMatthew J. BietzCynthia CheungNatacha AkshoomoffGraham Wideman
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (22 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (18 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (12 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Cinnamon S. Bloss
80 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Genetics 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 670
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 621
- Molecular Biology 464
- Clinical Psychology 341
Countries citing papers authored by Cinnamon S. Bloss
This map shows the geographic impact of Cinnamon S. Bloss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cinnamon S. Bloss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cinnamon S. Bloss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cinnamon S. Bloss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cinnamon S. Bloss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cinnamon S. Bloss. The network helps show where Cinnamon S. Bloss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cinnamon S. Bloss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cinnamon S. Bloss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cinnamon S. Bloss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cinnamon S. Bloss. Cinnamon S. Bloss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | Common repeat polymorphism in the dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3 is associated with stop signal reaction time (SSRT) and motion coherence threshold (MCT) | 1 |
| 15 | 101 | |
| 16 | 131 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 105 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Cinnamon S. Bloss
Cinnamon S. Bloss is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Genetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (22 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (18 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.3k citations), Health Informatics (47 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (670 citations). Cinnamon S. Bloss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas J. Schork, Eric J. Topol, Eric Courchesne, Burcu F. Darst, Matthew J. Bietz, Cynthia Cheung, Natacha Akshoomoff, Graham Wideman, Ruth A. Carper and Cynthia M. Schumann. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.