Nicholas C. Mullins
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark OromanerJoseph Ben‐DavidFrederick SuppeBelver C. GriffithDaniel SullivanLowell L. HargensEdward L. KickJohn A. Sonquist
- Topics
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers)Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers)Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nicholas C. Mullins
37 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Sociology and Political Science 658
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 349
- History and Philosophy of Science 235
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 167
- Economics and Econometrics 129
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas C. Mullins
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas C. Mullins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas C. Mullins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas C. Mullins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas C. Mullins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas C. Mullins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas C. Mullins. The network helps show where Nicholas C. Mullins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas C. Mullins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas C. Mullins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas C. Mullins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas C. Mullins. Nicholas C. Mullins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 154 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 205 | |
| 11 | 269 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Nicholas C. Mullins
Nicholas C. Mullins is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and General Social Sciences, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (235 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (349 citations) and General Psychology (30 citations). Nicholas C. Mullins has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Oromaner, Joseph Ben‐David, Frederick Suppe, Belver C. Griffith, Daniel Sullivan, Lowell L. Hargens, Edward L. Kick, John A. Sonquist, Marcello Truzzi and Robert Dubin. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.