Citations per year, relative to Nicholas Abercrombie Nicholas Abercrombie (= 1×)
peers
Roland Marchand
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Abercrombie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Abercrombie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Abercrombie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Abercrombie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Abercrombie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Abercrombie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Abercrombie. The network helps show where Nicholas Abercrombie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Abercrombie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Abercrombie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Abercrombie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Abercrombie. Nicholas Abercrombie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Farr, Michelle, et al.. (2014). Proving the value of advice:A study of the advice service of Bath and North East Somerset Citizens Advice Bureau. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath).1 indexed citations
2.
Cressey, Peter, et al.. (2014). IPR Policy Brief - Proving the value of advice: a study of the impact of Citizens' Advice Bureau services. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath).2 indexed citations
3.
Abercrombie, Nicholas & Brian Longhurst. (2007). The Penguin Dictionary of Media Studies. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).9 indexed citations
4.
Abercrombie, Nicholas, et al.. (2001). The Contemporary British Society Reader. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
Abercrombie, Nicholas. (1996). Television and society. Medical Entomology and Zoology.49 indexed citations
7.
Abercrombie, Nicholas, Stephen Hill, & Bryan S. Turner. (1994). Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Medical Entomology and Zoology.81 indexed citations
8.
Abercrombie, Nicholas, Alan Warde, Keith Soothill, John Urry, & Sylvia Walby. (1994). Contemporary British Society: A New Introduction To Sociology. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).6 indexed citations
Warde, Alan & Nicholas Abercrombie. (1992). Social Change in Contemporary Britain. Medical Entomology and Zoology.54 indexed citations
12.
Abercrombie, Nicholas, et al.. (1992). Enterprise Culture.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 21(2). 246–246.1 indexed citations
13.
Marsh, Catherine, Roger Jowell, Sharon Witherspoon, et al.. (1989). British Social Attitudes: The 5th Report. British Journal of Sociology. 40(4). 694–694.49 indexed citations
14.
McLennan, Gregor, Nicholas Abercrombie, Stephen Hill, & Bryan S. Turner. (1987). Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism. British Journal of Sociology. 38(4). 589–589.40 indexed citations
15.
Abercrombie, Nicholas & Brian Longhurst. (1983). Interpreting Mannheim. Theory Culture & Society. 2(1). 5–15.6 indexed citations
Long, Theodore, Nicholas Abercrombie, Stephen Hill, Bryan S. Turner, & David Held. (1981). The Dominant Ideology Thesis. Sociological Analysis. 42(3). 289–289.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.