Nia A. White
- Plant Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Richard P. HastingsJohn W. PalfreymanJames BownJohn W. CrawfordRuth E. FalconerPaul D. HallettLynne BoddyDebbie S. Feeney
- Topics
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (11 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers)Plant and animal studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumPoland
In The Last Decade
Nia A. White
25 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Plant Science 317
- Clinical Psychology 197
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 138
- Biomedical Engineering 103
- Cell Biology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Nia A. White
This map shows the geographic impact of Nia A. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nia A. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nia A. White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nia A. White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nia A. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nia A. White. The network helps show where Nia A. White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nia A. White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nia A. White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nia A. White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nia A. White. Nia A. White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | Assessing the impact of biological exudates associated with soil water repellency | 1 |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 65 | |
| 8 | 190 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | The limited utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination in screening people over the age of 75 years for dementia in primary care. | 30 |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About Nia A. White
Nia A. White is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Conservation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (11 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (197 citations), Plant Science (317 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (138 citations). Nia A. White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Hastings, John W. Palfreyman, James Bown, John W. Crawford, Ruth E. Falconer, Paul D. Hallett, Lynne Boddy, Debbie S. Feeney, Karl Ritz and Iain M. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Oikos and Geoderma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.