John W. Palfreyman
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Immunology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Moyra E.M. CampbellChris M. PrestonD. G. T. ThomasNia A. WhiteHarry StainesJ. G. RatcliffeV. G. PrestonBernadette M. Dutia
- Topics
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (13 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSlovakiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John W. Palfreyman
53 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
- Epidemiology 823
- Molecular Biology 440
- Plant Science 375
- Genetics 365
- Immunology 276
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Palfreyman
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Palfreyman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Palfreyman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Palfreyman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Palfreyman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Palfreyman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Palfreyman. The network helps show where John W. Palfreyman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Palfreyman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Palfreyman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Palfreyman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Palfreyman. John W. Palfreyman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | On the identity of certain isolates of Serpula lacrymans | 13 |
| 15 | Use of an immunological method for the detection of Lentinus lepideus in distribution poles. | 1 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 95 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About John W. Palfreyman
John W. Palfreyman is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Behavioral Neuroscience and Conservation, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (13 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (157 citations), Research and Theory (27 citations) and Epidemiology (823 citations). John W. Palfreyman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Moyra E.M. Campbell, Chris M. Preston, D. G. T. Thomas, Nia A. White, Harry Staines, J. G. Ratcliffe, V. G. Preston, Bernadette M. Dutia, H. S. Marsden and RM Hope. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Molecular Biology and Journal of Virology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.