This map shows the geographic impact of Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Newman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Newman. The network helps show where Newman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Newman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Newman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Newman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Newman. Newman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Newman. (2019). . Agricultural History. 93(3). 558–558.
4.
Newman. (2017). Protecting Patron Privacy: A Lita Guide.7 indexed citations
5.
John, John K., Xiong, Yue Yue, et al.. (2016). Tracking domestic ducks:A novel approach for documenting poultry market chains in the context of avian inlfuenza transmission. 农业科学学报:英文版. 1584–1594.1 indexed citations
Newman, et al.. (2015). Do on-farm natural, restored, managed and constructed wetlands mitigate agricultural pollution in Great Britain and Ireland?. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).1 indexed citations
8.
Angela, Angela, et al.. (2013). Informing healthy building design with biophilic urbanism design principles: a review and synthesis of current knowledge and research.5 indexed citations
Newman, et al.. (2000). Application of the Uniform Commercial Code to Option Contracts for the Sale of Goods, and Implying Promises to Find Sufficient Consideration: Why and How the North Carolina Supreme Court Got It Wrong in Fordham v. Eason. 23(1). 49.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.