King
Impact in
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
- Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Papers in
- Classics 3
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 2
-
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 3
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 2
King
18 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 82
- Environmental Chemistry 56
- Earth-Surface Processes 34
- Paleontology 35
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
Countries citing papers authored by King
This map shows the geographic impact of King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by King. The network helps show where King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The policy-driven peak and reduction of China's carbon emissions | 2020 | 1 |
| 2 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | Recent Advances and Challenges of Visual Signa Quality Assessment | 2013 | 8 |
| 7 | Application of snowmelt runoff model （SRM） in mountainous watersheds： A review | 2012 | 1 |
| 8 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 9 | The Dynamic Dance | 2004 | 6 |
| 10 | 1999 | 45 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 74 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 14 | Medicaid Survival Kit | 1996 | 2 |
| 15 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 16 | The effect of particle-size distribution on the flotation of two South African coals | 1986 | 6 |
| 17 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 115 | |
| 19 | Boethius' Bearbeitung von Aristoteles' Schrift "De interpretatione" | 1975 | 2 |
| 20 | Boethius' Bearbeitung der "Categoriae" des Aristoteles | 1972 | 0 |
About King
King is a scholar working on Classics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Water Science and Technology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 20 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1 paper) and Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (82 citations), Environmental Chemistry (56 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (34 citations), Paleontology (35 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations). King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Serra, Peter J. Havel, Schwartz, Seán Rooney, J E J Krige, Newman, Deng Deng, Lin, Ma - and Larry R. Myer. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Victorian Studies, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, World Patent Information and Medium Ævum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.