Neville Meaney
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Demography
- History top 10%
- Anthropology
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (12 papers)Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (6 papers)Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsSociology and Political ScienceCultural Studies
- Partner nations
- AustraliaIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Neville Meaney
19 papers receiving 134 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Demography 27
- History 23
- Anthropology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Neville Meaney
This map shows the geographic impact of Neville Meaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neville Meaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neville Meaney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neville Meaney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neville Meaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neville Meaney. The network helps show where Neville Meaney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neville Meaney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neville Meaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neville Meaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neville Meaney. Neville Meaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | Japan and Australia's foreign policy, 1945-1952 | 0 |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Towards a New Vision Australia and Japan Through 100 Years | 10 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | The Japanese Connection. A Survey of Australian Leaders' Attitudes Towards Japan and the Australia-Japan Relationship. | 3 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Neville Meaney
Neville Meaney is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Geography, Planning and Development and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (12 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (6 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (81 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations) and Cultural Studies (20 citations). Neville Meaney has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. McMahon, John McCarthy, Sol Encel and C. Hartley Grattan. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.