Neil Wright

594 citations
17 papers · 86 indexed · h-index 3

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Christian Theology and Mission

Papers in

Neil Wright

8 papers receiving 60 citations

Peers

Neil Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Classics 18
  • Religious studies 22
  • Health 14
  • History 16
  • Philosophy 16
Replace Joshua Trachtenberg with:
Joshua Trachtenberg
Clare Watkins United Kingdom
Columba Stewart United Kingdom
Ernest S. Frerichs
Oswald Bayer Germany
Thomas M. Bolin United States
Hans Boersma Canada
Tim Vivian
Ann Loades United Kingdom
Wayne G. Rollins United Kingdom
Neil Wright relative to Joshua Trachtenberg Joshua Trachtenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joshua Trachtenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Wright. The network helps show where Neil Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Neil Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Wright Line = papers co-authored together Neil Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20200
2
Reading Mark in context: Jesus and Second Temple Judaism
20181
3
The history of the kings of Britain : an edition and translation of De gestis Britonum (Historia regum Britanniae)
200912
4
Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church
200955
5 20092
6 20012
7
History and Literature in Late Antiquity and the Early Medieval West: Studies in Intertextuality
19951
8 19932
9 19920
10
Gesta regum Britannie
19910
11 19913
12 19911
13
The first variant version : a critical edition
19881
14 19861
15 19862
16
Bern, Burgerbibliothek, MS. 568
19851
17 19852

About Neil Wright

Neil Wright is a scholar working on Classics, General Arts and Humanities, History, Religious studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 86 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (18 citations), Religious studies (22 citations), Health (14 citations), History (16 citations) and Philosophy (16 citations). Neil Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Noel B. Reynolds, M. D. Reeve, Françoise Le Saux, Aleksey V. Nenarokomov, О. М. Алифанов, A. Haji‐Sheikh, Robert L. McMasters, Keith A. Woodbury, Kevin J. Dowding and Tianshou Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Revue Bénédictine, Peritia, Journal of Christian Education, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer and Sacris Erudiri.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026