Revue Bénédictine
- Classics top 2%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Religious studies top 10%
- Philosophy
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and HistoryHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeByzantine Studies and History
In The Last Decade
Revue Bénédictine
213 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Classics 472
- History 391
- Sociology and Political Science 118
- Religious studies 106
- Philosophy 66
Countries where authors publish in Revue Bénédictine
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue Bénédictine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue Bénédictine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue Bénédictine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Revue Bénédictine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue Bénédictine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue Bénédictine.
About Revue Bénédictine
The 494 papers published in Revue Bénédictine in the last decades have received a total of 683 indexed citations . Papers published in Revue Bénédictine usually cover Classics (236 papers), History (227 papers) and Religious studies (54 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (149 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (125 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue Bénédictine are Valerie I. J. Flint, Michael M. Gorman, Paul Meyvaert, Rodney M. Thomson, Thomas F. X. Noble, Neil Adkin, A. C. Dionisotti, Irven M. Resnick, H. E. J. Cowdrey and Daniel F. Callahan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.