Sacris Erudiri
- Topics
- Byzantine Studies and HistoryHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeClassical Antiquity Studies
In The Last Decade
Sacris Erudiri
113 papers receiving 174 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Classics 184
- History 156
- Sociology and Political Science 72
- Religious studies 69
- Archeology 63
Countries where authors publish in Sacris Erudiri
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sacris Erudiri. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sacris Erudiri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sacris Erudiri more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sacris Erudiri
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sacris Erudiri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sacris Erudiri.
About Sacris Erudiri
The 292 papers published in Sacris Erudiri in the last decades have received a total of 352 indexed citations . Papers published in Sacris Erudiri usually cover Classics (117 papers), Religious studies (53 papers) and History (94 papers) specifically the topics of Byzantine Studies and History (58 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (49 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sacris Erudiri are Bernhard Bischoff, Charles W. Jones, Robert W. Wisniewski, Geoffrey D. Dunn, Beverly Mayne Kienzle, William V. Mayer, Michael Lapidge, Amnon Linder, Paul Meyvaert and Neil Adkin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.