Neil W. Roach

1.6k total citations
52 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Neil W. Roach is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil W. Roach has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Neil W. Roach's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (36 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (19 papers). Neil W. Roach is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (36 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (19 papers). Neil W. Roach collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Japan. Neil W. Roach's co-authors include Paul V. McGraw, James Heron, John H. Hogben, David Whitaker, Ben S. Webb, Craig Aaen‐Stockdale, Veronica Edwards, David P. McGovern, Alan Johnston and Timothy Ledgeway and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Neil W. Roach

49 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Neil W. Roach
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 989
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 500
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 223
  • Sensory Systems 190
  • Statistics and Probability 164
Replace Elliot Freeman with:
Elliot Freeman United Kingdom
Jason Fischer United States
Jochen Laubrock Germany
Valérie Goffaux Belgium
Françoise Vitu France
Maarten J. van der Smagt Netherlands
Boutheina Jemel Canada
Clara Casco Italy
Roberto Arrighi Italy
Shai Gabay Israel
Elliot Freeman United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Neil W. Roach
Neil W. Roach · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Neil W. Roach
Neil W. Roach · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Neil W. Roach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil W. Roach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil W. Roach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil W. Roach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil W. Roach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil W. Roach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil W. Roach. The network helps show where Neil W. Roach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil W. Roach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil W. Roach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil W. Roach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil W. Roach. Neil W. Roach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 10
4 5
5 5
6 2
7 6
8 18
9 13
10 75
11 31
12 1
13 3
14 4
15 24
16 15
17 14
18 31
19 13
20 20

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026