Elliot Freeman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 20
- Neural dynamics and brain function 17
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 6
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 5
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 4
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills 6
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 13
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 3
- Co-authors
- Jon DriverMarinella CappellettiDov SagiLisa CipolottiGeraint ReesCharlotte RussellMassimo TurattoGreg Davis
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyIsrael
In The Last Decade
Elliot Freeman
32 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- Statistics and Probability 253
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 337
- Sensory Systems 98
- Neurology 117
Countries citing papers authored by Elliot Freeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot Freeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elliot Freeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot Freeman. The network helps show where Elliot Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elliot Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 82 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 75 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 384 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 69 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 193 |
About Elliot Freeman
Elliot Freeman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Sensory Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (17 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (13 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Statistics and Probability (253 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (337 citations), Sensory Systems (98 citations) and Neurology (117 citations). Elliot Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jon Driver, Marinella Cappelletti, Dov Sagi, Lisa Cipolotti, Jon Driver, Geraint Rees, Charlotte Russell, Massimo Turatto, Greg Davis and Ralf Deichmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Cortex, Current Biology, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.