John Farhall

2.9k citations
90 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

John Farhall

86 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

John Farhall
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
  • Applied Psychology 297
  • Clinical Psychology 836
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 471
  • Philosophy 343
Replace Mark Hayward with:
Mark Hayward United Kingdom
Jasper Palmier‐Claus United Kingdom
Miriam Fornells‐Ambrojo United Kingdom
Katherine L. Dixon–Gordon United States
Kate Davidson United Kingdom
Alan E. Fruzzetti United States
Steven E. Hyler United States
Lolafaye Coyne United States
Matthew S. Lebowitz United States
Johannes C. Ehrenthal Germany
John Farhall relative to Mark Hayward United Kingdom Mark Hayward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark Hayward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Farhall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Farhall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Farhall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Farhall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Farhall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Farhall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Farhall. The network helps show where John Farhall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Farhall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Farhall Line = papers co-authored together John Farhall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200798
2 201597
3 201191
4 200774
5 199766
6 201855
7 201654
8 201949
9 201949
10 201346
11 201144
12 201643
13 200143
14 201542
15 201041
16 200938
17 200337
18 201435
19 201035
20 201332

About John Farhall

John Farhall is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (45 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (24 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (23 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (16 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (12 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.0k citations), Applied Psychology (297 citations), Clinical Psychology (836 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (471 citations) and Philosophy (343 citations). John Farhall has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neil Thomas, Frances Shawyer, David Copolov, Susan L. Rossell, Tom Trauer, Andrew Mackinnon, David Castle, Ellie Fossey, Fiona Foley and Ben Ong. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Schizophrenia Research, Psychiatry Research and Early Intervention in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026