Jo-Anne Abbott
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 9
- Co-authors
- Britt KleinDavid AustinLisa CiechomskiAddie WoottenCatherine Hamilton‐GiachritsisNeil ThomasMarita P. McCabeAngela Tod
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3 papers)Journal of Cystic Fibrosis (3 papers)Internet Interventions (3 papers)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jo-Anne Abbott
40 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Applied Psychology 284
- Clinical Psychology 303
- Social Psychology 218
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
- General Health Professions 224
Countries citing papers authored by Jo-Anne Abbott
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo-Anne Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo-Anne Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo-Anne Abbott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo-Anne Abbott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo-Anne Abbott. The network helps show where Jo-Anne Abbott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo-Anne Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 83 | |
| 7 | Integrating ePsychology into practice and research: A guide for early career psychologists | 2015 | 2 |
| 8 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 19 | An Australian survey of palliative care and hospice bereavement services. | 2008 | 9 |
| 20 | 2001 | 71 |
About Jo-Anne Abbott
Jo-Anne Abbott is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Research and Theory, General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (284 citations), Clinical Psychology (303 citations), Social Psychology (218 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations) and General Health Professions (224 citations). Jo-Anne Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Britt Klein, David Austin, Lisa Ciechomski, Addie Wootten, Catherine Hamilton‐Giachritsis, Neil Thomas, Marita P. McCabe, Angela Tod, Andrew J. Rosenthal and Michael Kyrios. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Internet Interventions, Journal of Cancer Survivorship and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.