Neil Stammers

591 total citations
13 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Neil Stammers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Stammers has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 2 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Neil Stammers's work include Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (1 paper). Neil Stammers is often cited by papers focused on Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (1 paper). Neil Stammers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Neil Stammers's co-authors include Catherine Eschle, Ken Buckley, Helga Dittmar, Philip Larkin, Charles Lees, Luke Martell, Francis McGowan and Marie-Bénédicte Dembour and has published in prestigious journals such as Political Studies, Human Rights Quarterly and Social movement studies.

In The Last Decade

Neil Stammers

13 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil Stammers United Kingdom	9	202	114	66	34	30	13	285
Maha Abdelrahman United Kingdom	10	315 1.6×	176 1.5×	33 0.5×	11 0.3×	16 0.5×	16	409
Sheridan Johns United States	11	359 1.8×	124 1.1×	50 0.8×	57 1.7×	11 0.4×	31	532
Gisela Geisler Norway	9	179 0.9×	71 0.6×	31 0.5×	24 0.7×	21 0.7×	16	327
John G. Dale United States	6	182 0.9×	117 1.0×	58 0.9×	47 1.4×	4 0.1×	14	309
Ruth First	11	229 1.1×	98 0.9×	49 0.7×	38 1.1×	13 0.4×	26	406
Kristin Mann United States	9	197 1.0×	55 0.5×	42 0.6×	31 0.9×	17 0.6×	31	454
Marshall S. Clough United States	7	203 1.0×	86 0.8×	50 0.8×	6 0.2×	18 0.6×	17	380
Leo Zeilig United Kingdom	11	204 1.0×	67 0.6×	29 0.4×	7 0.2×	12 0.4×	33	306
Oliver Mendelsohn Australia	6	145 0.7×	135 1.2×	10 0.2×	15 0.4×	12 0.4×	14	287
Roger Epp Canada	8	257 1.3×	291 2.6×	38 0.6×	8 0.2×	30 1.0×	13	475

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Stammers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Stammers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Stammers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Stammers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Stammers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Stammers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Stammers. The network helps show where Neil Stammers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Stammers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Stammers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Stammers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Stammers. Neil Stammers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte & Neil Stammers. (2018). Free trade, protectionism, neoliberalism: tensions and continuities. University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton). 6(2). 169–188. 2 indexed citations

2.

Stammers, Neil. (2016). Human Rights and Social Movements: Theoretical Perspectives. Revue interdisciplinaire d études juridiques. Volume 75(2). 67–89. 9 indexed citations

3.

Stammers, Neil. (2016). Human rights and the food sovereignty movement: reclaiming control. Social movement studies. 16(2). 266–267. 19 indexed citations

4.

Stammers, Neil. (2009). Human Rights and Social Movements. Pluto Press eBooks. 54 indexed citations

5.

Eschle, Catherine & Neil Stammers. (2004). Taking Part: Social Movements, INGOs, and Global Change. Alternatives Global Local Political. 29(3). 333–372. 12 indexed citations

6.

Stammers, Neil. (2003). Social Movements, Human Rights, and the Challenge to Power. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 97. 299–301. 2 indexed citations

7.

Martell, Luke, et al.. (2001). Social Democracy: Global and National Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 18 indexed citations

8.

Stammers, Neil, et al.. (1999). Teaching and Learning Politics: A Survey of Practices and Change in UK Universities. Political Studies. 47(1). 114–126. 9 indexed citations

9.

Stammers, Neil. (1999). Social Movements and the Social Construction of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 21(4). 980–1008. 116 indexed citations

10.

Stammers, Neil. (1995). A Critique of Social Approaches to Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 17(3). 488–508. 25 indexed citations

11.

Stammers, Neil. (1993). Human Rights and Power. Political Studies. 41(1). 70–82. 12 indexed citations

12.

Stammers, Neil. (1984). Civil Liberties in Britain During the 2nd World War: A Political Study. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 2 indexed citations

13.

Buckley, Ken & Neil Stammers. (1984). Civil Liberties in Britain during the 2nd World War. Labour History. 165–165. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact