Philip Larkin

6.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
135 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Philip Larkin is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Larkin has authored 135 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 70 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 45 papers in General Health Professions and 39 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Larkin's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (69 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (27 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (20 papers). Philip Larkin is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (69 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (27 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (20 papers). Philip Larkin collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Philip Larkin's co-authors include Paul Schotsmans, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Anneke L. Francke, Jenny T. van der Steen, Kathy Murphy, Lukas Radbruch, Pam Firth, Ladislav Volicer, Saskia Jünger and Dianne Gove and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Philip Larkin

127 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care

2013 659 citations Jenny T. van der Steen, Philip Larkin et al. Palliative Medicine profile →
Prognostic Factors in Advanced Cancer Patients: Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations—A Study by the Steering Committee of the European Association for Palliative Care

2005 515 citations Philip Larkin et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Larkin Ireland	28	1.9k	1.1k	822	601	461	135	3.8k
Davina Porock United Kingdom	33	1.5k 0.8×	1.5k 1.4×	573 0.7×	418 0.7×	745 1.6×	107	3.9k
Tim Luckett Australia	34	1.8k 0.9×	1.0k 1.0×	584 0.7×	953 1.6×	1.0k 2.3×	170	4.1k
Barbara J. Daly United States	36	1.4k 0.7×	1.2k 1.1×	745 0.9×	513 0.9×	376 0.8×	184	4.0k
Joakim Öhlén Sweden	32	1.9k 1.0×	2.0k 1.8×	809 1.0×	507 0.8×	514 1.1×	173	4.4k
Ardith Z. Doorenbos United States	37	1.9k 1.0×	1.6k 1.5×	781 1.0×	764 1.3×	763 1.7×	202	4.6k
Susan Eggly United States	35	1.8k 0.9×	1.8k 1.7×	489 0.6×	620 1.0×	608 1.3×	127	4.2k
Carina Berterö Sweden	33	1.1k 0.6×	994 0.9×	694 0.8×	446 0.7×	511 1.1×	161	3.5k
Liz Grant United Kingdom	29	1.1k 0.6×	861 0.8×	604 0.7×	557 0.9×	324 0.7×	125	3.4k
Elisa J. Gordon United States	38	2.8k 1.5×	1.8k 1.7×	568 0.7×	590 1.0×	358 0.8×	215	5.9k
Pedro Lopes Ferreira Portugal	32	924 0.5×	1.4k 1.3×	466 0.6×	359 0.6×	274 0.6×	208	3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Larkin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Larkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Larkin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Larkin. The network helps show where Philip Larkin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Larkin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Larkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Larkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Larkin. Philip Larkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Steen, Jenny T. van der, Lieve Van den Block, Miharu Nakanishi, et al.. (2025). Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 69(6). e755–e772. 1 indexed citations

Probst, Sebastian, et al.. (2025). Unveiling the hidden pain and daily struggles of individuals with a venous leg ulcer: a thematic analysis. Journal of Tissue Viability. 34(3). 100906–100906. 1 indexed citations

Laranjeira, Carlos, et al.. (2024). The experience of hope in dyads living with advanced chronic illness in Portugal: a longitudinal mixed-methods study. BMC Palliative Care. 23(1). 207–207. 1 indexed citations

Riese, Florian, et al.. (2024). Person Profile Dementia Intervention in Long-Term Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 26(1). 105351–105351. 2 indexed citations

Bernard, Mathieu, et al.. (2024). Interdisciplinary research approach based on a mixed-methods design to explore patient altruism at the end of life: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 14(5). e085632–e085632.

Larkin, Philip, et al.. (2024). Application and challenges of using a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to address an undertheorized clinical challenge: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. 6. 100199–100199. 2 indexed citations

Borasio, Gian Domenico, Michael J. Deml, Claudia Gamondi, et al.. (2024). Patient altruism at the end of life: A scoping review. Palliative & Supportive Care. 22(5). 1427–1439. 2 indexed citations

Larkin, Philip, et al.. (2024). Making Conscientious Decisions: Engaging in Venous Leg Ulcer Self-Management Following Nurse-Led Patient Education. Qualitative Health Research. 35(8). 901–915. 3 indexed citations

Sweeney, Alison, Atif Awan, Lisa Gibbs, et al.. (2024). The use of art as a creative research method to understand psychosocial care needs for children with rare diseases. 5. 1 indexed citations

10.

Volken, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 6(1). 14–14. 5 indexed citations

11.

Wolf‐Linder, Susanne de, et al.. (2021). Improving caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes using IPOS‐Dem: A stepped‐wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(10). 4234–4245. 7 indexed citations

12.

Larkin, Philip, et al.. (2020). Experiences of Venous Leg Ulcer persons following an individualised nurse-led education: protocol for a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. BMJ Open. 10(11). e042605–e042605. 6 indexed citations

13.

Dowling, Michael, Cathy Payne, Philip Larkin, & Dan Ryan. (2019). Does an Interactive, Teleconference-Delivered, Palliative Care Lecture Series Improve Nursing Home Staff Confidence?. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 23(2). 179–183. 12 indexed citations

14.

Zambrano, Sofía C., Carlos Centeno, Philip Larkin, & Steffen Eychmüller. (2019). Using the Term “Palliative Care”: International Survey of How Palliative Care Researchers and Academics Perceive the Term “Palliative Care”. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 23(2). 184–191. 9 indexed citations

15.

Hasson, Felicity, Deborah Muldrew, Emma Carduff, et al.. (2019). ‘Take more laxatives was their answer to everything’: A qualitative exploration of the patient, carer and healthcare professional experience of constipation in specialist palliative care. Palliative Medicine. 34(8). 1057–1066. 9 indexed citations

16.

McVeigh, Clare, Joanne Reid, Philip Larkin, Sam Porter, & Peter Hudson. (2017). The experience of palliative care service provision for people with non‐malignant respiratory disease and their family carers: An all‐Ireland qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 74(2). 383–394. 17 indexed citations

17.

Dempsey, Laura, Maura Dowling, Philip Larkin, & Kathy Murphy. (2016). Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research. Research in Nursing & Health. 39(6). 480–490. 160 indexed citations

18.

McCoy, Siobhán, Abel Wakai, Carol Blackburn, et al.. (2013). Structured sedation programs in the emergency department, hospital and other acute settings: protocol for systematic review of effects and events. Systematic Reviews. 2(1). 89–89. 7 indexed citations

19.

Martell, Luke, et al.. (2001). Social Democracy: Global and National Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 18 indexed citations

20.

Larkin, Philip, et al.. (2001). Further Requirements: Interviews, Broadcasts, Statements and Book Reviews, 1952-85. Faber and Faber eBooks. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact