Neil Rhodes
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Classics top 10%
- Anthropology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Stuart GillespieSonia MassaiHelen SmithJason Scott‐WarrenWilliam H. ShermanWendy WallPeter StallybrassLouise Wilson
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers)Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers)Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Neil Rhodes
17 papers receiving 97 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 48
- History 31
- Classics 23
- Anthropology 20
- Sociology and Political Science 19
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Rhodes
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Rhodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Rhodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Rhodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Rhodes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Rhodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Rhodes. The network helps show where Neil Rhodes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Rhodes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Rhodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Rhodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Rhodes. Neil Rhodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Programming for the Newton®: Software Development with Newtonscript™ | 0 |
| 8 | Shakespeare And Elizabethan Popular Culture: Arden Critical Companion | 0 |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Palm programming : the developer's guide | 12 |
| 14 | Palm Programming: The Developer's Guide with CD-ROM | 5 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | The Power of Eloquence and English Renaissance Literature | 19 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | The complete CB handbook | 1 |
About Neil Rhodes
Neil Rhodes is a scholar working on Classics, Museology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 24 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (23 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations) and History (31 citations). Neil Rhodes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Gillespie, Sonia Massai, Helen Smith, Jason Scott‐Warren, William H. Sherman, Wendy Wall, Peter Stallybrass, Louise Wilson, Danielle Clarke and Juliet Fleming. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Renaissance and Reformation and Huntington Library Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.