John Lavagnino
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 10%
- Anthropology
- Classics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Gary TaylorThomas MiddletonErin SullivanSharon O’DairPeter HollandJulia FlandersFarah Karim‐CooperPeter Kirwan
- Topics
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers)Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers)Irish and British Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Lavagnino
10 papers receiving 73 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Literature and Literary Theory 72
- History 25
- Anthropology 24
- Classics 19
- Artificial Intelligence 16
Countries citing papers authored by John Lavagnino
This map shows the geographic impact of John Lavagnino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lavagnino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lavagnino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Lavagnino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lavagnino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lavagnino. The network helps show where John Lavagnino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Lavagnino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Lavagnino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Lavagnino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Lavagnino. John Lavagnino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare | 0 |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts | 6 |
| 4 | Electronic Publishing: Politics and Pragmatics | 1 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | When Not to Use TEI | 4 |
| 9 | On Hypertexts: an essay-review of Paolo D'Iorio and Daniel Ferrer, editors, Bibliothèques d'écrivains, María José Vega, editor, Literatura hipertextual y teoría literaria, and Jerome McGann, Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web. | 0 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 |
About John Lavagnino
John Lavagnino is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (72 citations), Classics (19 citations) and Museology (13 citations). John Lavagnino has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary Taylor, Thomas Middleton, Erin Sullivan, Sharon O’Dair, Peter Holland, Julia Flanders, Farah Karim‐Cooper, Peter Kirwan, Christie Carson and Katherine Rowe. Their work appears in journals such as Literary and Linguistic Computing, Journal of Electronic Publishing and Critical Survey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.