Neil Moore

2.2k citations
24 papers · 334 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Moore

20 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Neil Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cell Biology 108
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 130
  • Pharmacology 84
  • Plant Science 136
  • Molecular Biology 105
Replace Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar with:
Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar India
Iovanna Pandelova United States
Inkyu Park South Korea
Adriaan Vanheule Belgium
Ming-He Li China
Dequan Liang China
Jei-Wan Lee South Korea
Wei Ye China
Han Min Wong United Kingdom
Junmei Yin China
Neil Moore relative to Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar India Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Moore. The network helps show where Neil Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Moore Line = papers co-authored together Neil Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201582
2 201765
3 201651
4 201751
5 201635
6 20058
7 20108
8 20096
9 20134
10 20054
11 20103
12
Geometric data structures for multihierarchical XML tagging of manuscripts
20043
13 20142
14 20112
15 20182
16
Database Support for Image-Based Electronic Editions
20042
17 20182
18 20121
19 20201
20 20131

About Neil Moore

Neil Moore is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computer Networks and Communications, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (4 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (108 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (130 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations), Plant Science (136 citations) and Molecular Biology (105 citations). Neil Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Christopher L. Schardl, Jerzy W. Jaromczyk, Ester Buiate, Lisa J. Vaillancourt, Jolanta Jaromczyk, Daniel G. Panaccione, Jennifer Webb, Johanna E. Takach, Nikki D. Charlton and Carolyn A. Young. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Bioinformatics, BMC Genomics, Information and Computation, International Journal on Digital Libraries and G3 Genes Genomes Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact