Neil Davie
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Kurt R. StenmarkMaria G. FridJohn Τ. ReevesJohn WhartonPaul D. UptonNicholas W. MorrellJulia M. PolakTodd C. Carpenter
- Topics
- Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (37 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (7 papers)Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (7 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineJournal of Applied Physiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Neil Davie
41 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.6k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 880
- Molecular Biology 415
- Physiology 335
- Surgery 270
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Davie
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Davie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Davie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Davie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Davie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Davie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Davie. The network helps show where Neil Davie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Davie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Davie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Davie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Davie. Neil Davie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 151 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 72 | |
| 16 | 340 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 94 | |
| 19 | 248 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Neil Davie
Neil Davie is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (37 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (7 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.6k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (880 citations) and Genetics (248 citations). Neil Davie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kurt R. Stenmark, Maria G. Frid, John Τ. Reeves, John Wharton, Paul D. Upton, Nicholas W. Morrell, Julia M. Polak, Todd C. Carpenter, Evgenia Gerasimovskaya and Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.