Neha P. Gothe
- Physiology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Edward McAuleyArthur F. KramerAmanda N. Szabo‐ReedErin A. OlsonThomas R. WójcickiMichelle W. VossEmily L. MaileyJason Fanning
- Topics
- Physical Activity and Health (29 papers)Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (16 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainMexico
In The Last Decade
Neha P. Gothe
77 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Physiology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 861
- Psychiatry and Mental health 733
- Clinical Psychology 673
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 582
Countries citing papers authored by Neha P. Gothe
This map shows the geographic impact of Neha P. Gothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neha P. Gothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neha P. Gothe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neha P. Gothe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neha P. Gothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neha P. Gothe. The network helps show where Neha P. Gothe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neha P. Gothe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neha P. Gothe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neha P. Gothe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neha P. Gothe. Neha P. Gothe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 72 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 107 |
About Neha P. Gothe
Neha P. Gothe is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Applied Psychology, having authored 82 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (29 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (16 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (379 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (287 citations) and Rehabilitation (371 citations). Neha P. Gothe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Edward McAuley, Arthur F. Kramer, Amanda N. Szabo‐Reed, Erin A. Olson, Thomas R. Wójcicki, Michelle W. Voss, Emily L. Mailey, Jason Fanning, Kirk I. Erickson and Sean P. Mullen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.