Neave O’Clery
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Transportation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Business and International Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dario DiodatoFrank NeffkeRicardo HausmannDavid L. RigbyElisa GiulianiTom BroekelPierre‐Alexandre BallandAromar Revi
- Topics
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (7 papers)Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers)Economic and Technological Innovation (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesColombia
In The Last Decade
Neave O’Clery
19 papers receiving 452 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Economics and Econometrics 290
- Transportation 67
- Global and Planetary Change 51
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50
- Business and International Management 46
Countries citing papers authored by Neave O’Clery
This map shows the geographic impact of Neave O’Clery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neave O’Clery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neave O’Clery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neave O’Clery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neave O’Clery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neave O’Clery. The network helps show where Neave O’Clery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neave O’Clery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neave O’Clery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neave O’Clery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neave O’Clery. Neave O’Clery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | Is academia becoming more localised? The growth of regional knowledge networks within international research collaboration | 9 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 138 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 95 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | A Tale of Two Clusters: The Evolution of Ireland's Economic Complexity since 1995 | 2 |
About Neave O’Clery
Neave O’Clery is a scholar working on Transportation, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 21 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (7 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers) and Economic and Technological Innovation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (46 citations), Economics and Econometrics (290 citations) and Transportation (67 citations). Neave O’Clery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Dario Diodato, Frank Neffke, Ricardo Hausmann, David L. Rigby, Elisa Giuliani, Tom Broekel, Pierre‐Alexandre Balland, Aromar Revi, Susan Parnell and Rafael Prieto-Curiel. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Research Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.