Neave O’Clery

864 total citations
21 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Neave O’Clery is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Transportation and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Neave O’Clery has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in Transportation and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Neave O’Clery's work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (7 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers) and Economic and Technological Innovation (6 papers). Neave O’Clery is often cited by papers focused on Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (7 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers) and Economic and Technological Innovation (6 papers). Neave O’Clery collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Colombia. Neave O’Clery's co-authors include Dario Diodato, Frank Neffke, Ricardo Hausmann, David L. Rigby, Elisa Giuliani, Tom Broekel, Pierre‐Alexandre Balland, Aromar Revi, Susan Parnell and Rafael Prieto-Curiel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Research Policy.

In The Last Decade

Neave O’Clery

19 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Neave O’Clery
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Economics and Econometrics 290
  • Transportation 67
  • Global and Planetary Change 51
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50
  • Business and International Management 46
Replace Xinran Wang with:
Xinran Wang China
Mateusz Tomal Poland
Ahoura Zandiatashbar United States
Jung Won Sonn United Kingdom
Maxim Pinkovskiy United States
Mudit Kapoor India
Dario Diodato United States
Yasir Tariq Mohmand Pakistan
Michał Wielechowski Poland
Xinran Wang China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Neave O’Clery
Neave O’Clery · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Neave O’Clery
Neave O’Clery · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Neave O’Clery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neave O’Clery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neave O’Clery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neave O’Clery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neave O’Clery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neave O’Clery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neave O’Clery. The network helps show where Neave O’Clery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neave O’Clery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neave O’Clery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neave O’Clery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neave O’Clery. Neave O’Clery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 1
5 11
6 32
7 7
8 15
9 11
10
Is academia becoming more localised? The growth of regional knowledge networks within international research collaboration
9
11 17
12 52
13 138
14 10
15 5
16 46
17 11
18 95
19 4
20
A Tale of Two Clusters: The Evolution of Ireland's Economic Complexity since 1995
2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026