Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox
2011422 citationsTom Broekel et al.Journal of Economic Geographyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Broekel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Broekel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Broekel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Broekel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Broekel. The network helps show where Tom Broekel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Broekel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Broekel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Broekel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Broekel. Tom Broekel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Broekel, Tom, et al.. (2021). Blowing against the winds of change? The relationship between anti-wind initiatives and wind turbines in Germany. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Broekel, Tom, et al.. (2018). Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An application of a two-mode STERGM to a project-based R&D network in the German Biotechnology industry. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
10.
Broekel, Tom, et al.. (2017). Analyzing the impact of R&D policy on regional diversification. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
Breul, Moritz, Tom Broekel, & Matthias Brachert. (2015). Die Treiber der räumlichen Emergenz und Konzentration der Photovoltaik-Industrie in Deutschland [The drivers of the spatial emergence and clustering of the photovoltaic industry in Germany]. MPRA Paper.1 indexed citations
Broekel, Tom, Pierre‐Alexandre Balland, Martijn Burger, & Frank van Oort. (2013). Modeling Knowledge Networks in Economic Geography: A Discussion of Four Empirical Strategies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
Broekel, Tom & Holger Graf. (2010). Structural properties of cooperation networks in Germany: From basic to applied research. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.7 indexed citations
19.
Broekel, Tom. (2010). Do cooperative R&D subsidies stimulate regional innovation efficiency? Evidence from Germany. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.8 indexed citations
20.
Witt, Ulrich, Tom Broekel, & Thomas Brenner. (2007). Knowledge and its Economic Characteristics: A Conceptual Clarification. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.