Neal Salisbury

74 total papers · 624 total citations
30 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Neal Salisbury is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Neal Salisbury has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Anthropology, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Neal Salisbury's work include Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (3 papers) and American History and Culture (3 papers). Neal Salisbury is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (3 papers) and American History and Culture (3 papers). Neal Salisbury collaborates with scholars based in United States. Neal Salisbury's co-authors include Alden T. Vaughan, Colin G. Calloway, Glenn W. LaFantasie, Bernard W. Sheehan, Yasuhide Kawashima, Allen W. Trelease, Paul D. Boyer, Stephen Nissenbaum, Kenneth A. Lockridge and R. David Edmunds and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

In The Last Decade

Neal Salisbury

24 papers receiving 124 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Neal Salisbury 113 50 49 33 22 30 245
James H. Merrell 87 0.8× 68 1.4× 45 0.9× 28 0.8× 13 0.6× 38 220
William J. Eccles 97 0.9× 110 2.2× 28 0.6× 41 1.2× 11 0.5× 23 263
Cornélius J. Jaenen 75 0.7× 122 2.4× 52 1.1× 34 1.0× 25 1.1× 38 271
Gregory Evans Dowd 119 1.1× 85 1.7× 78 1.6× 55 1.7× 20 0.9× 33 290
Daniel H. Usner 87 0.8× 65 1.3× 21 0.4× 14 0.4× 10 0.5× 32 190
Jean M. O’Brien 68 0.6× 56 1.1× 19 0.4× 17 0.5× 16 0.7× 22 175
Raymond J. DeMallie 93 0.8× 79 1.6× 25 0.5× 18 0.5× 22 1.0× 42 308
R. David Edmunds 92 0.8× 125 2.5× 63 1.3× 40 1.2× 30 1.4× 38 327
Camilla Townsend 86 0.8× 58 1.2× 48 1.0× 16 0.5× 16 0.7× 40 227
Raymond D. Fogelson 77 0.7× 58 1.2× 16 0.3× 16 0.5× 21 1.0× 21 189

Countries citing papers authored by Neal Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neal Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neal Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neal Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neal Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neal Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neal Salisbury. The network helps show where Neal Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neal Salisbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neal Salisbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neal Salisbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neal Salisbury. Neal Salisbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026