James T. Moore

85 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

James T. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Atmospheric Science 409
  • Global and Planetary Change 376
  • Control and Systems Engineering 314
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 312
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 285
Replace Thomas Bartz–Beielstein with:
Thomas Bartz–Beielstein Germany
Cheng‐Wu Chen Taiwan
Albert Madansky United States
İnci Batmaz Türkiye
Xiao-Min Hu China
Walter D. Fisher United States
Song Jiang China
Paul H. Randolph United States
Z. Kmietowicz United Kingdom
David Blockley United Kingdom
James T. Moore relative to Thomas Bartz–Beielstein Germany Thomas Bartz–Beielstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Thomas Bartz–Beielstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Moore. The network helps show where James T. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James T. Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James T. Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James T. Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James T. Moore. James T. Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 6
3
End of Treatment Consultation Evaluation
1
4 13
5 16
6
SCADA Trust Management System.
2
7 28
8 11
9
The role of conveyor belts in organizing processes associated with heavy banded snowfall
1
10 13
11 13
12 5
13 24
14
Examination of a Training Cold Season Heavy Rain Event Over the Ohio River Valley
1
15 23
16 1
17 3
18 3
19
Functional disability of geriatric patients in a family medicine program: implications for patient care, education, and research.
11
20 22

About James T. Moore

James T. Moore is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (16 papers), Climate variability and models (12 papers) and Optimization and Packing Problems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (312 citations), Atmospheric Science (409 citations) and Numerical Analysis (114 citations). James T. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan F. Bard, Charles E. Graves, Raymond R. Hill, James A. Bobula, Diana R. Silimperi, Martin A Baxter, Dennis H. Tolley, Thomas E. Lambert, Richard F. Deckro and J. Wesley Barnes. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Management Science and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026