N.E. Kolfschoten
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Rob A.�E.�M. TollenaarMichel W.J.M. WoutersNicoline J. van LeersumG.A. GooikerJ. KievitPerla J. Marang‐van de MheenH.S. SnijdersE.H. Eddes
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIndiaSpain
In The Last Decade
N.E. Kolfschoten
18 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Oncology 503
- Surgery 414
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 190
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 184
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 81
Countries citing papers authored by N.E. Kolfschoten
This map shows the geographic impact of N.E. Kolfschoten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.E. Kolfschoten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.E. Kolfschoten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N.E. Kolfschoten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.E. Kolfschoten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.E. Kolfschoten. The network helps show where N.E. Kolfschoten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N.E. Kolfschoten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N.E. Kolfschoten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N.E. Kolfschoten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N.E. Kolfschoten. N.E. Kolfschoten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 206 | |
| 16 | 120 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 'Clinical auditing', een nieuw kwaliteitsinstrument in de chirurgische oncologie | 1 |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About N.E. Kolfschoten
N.E. Kolfschoten is a scholar working on Equine, Family Practice and Oncology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (9 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (503 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (38 citations) and Surgery (414 citations). N.E. Kolfschoten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, India and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rob A.�E.�M. Tollenaar, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, Nicoline J. van Leersum, G.A. Gooiker, J. Kievit, Perla J. Marang‐van de Mheen, H.S. Snijders, E.H. Eddes, D. Henneman and A.C. de Vries. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.